Local Crimestoppers Hosts “Staying Safe In Great Falls” Event

Editor’s note: A public service announcement from Great Falls/Cascade County Crimestoppers.

What: Crime and the Law – Staying SAFE in Great Falls

When: Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 6:30 PM

Where: University of Providence, Great Falls

Join Crimestoppers on Thursday, March 31, 2022 for a Community Crime program featuring local and regional experts talking about how the law affects what they can and cannot do. FREE to attend.

Panelists include:
* Municipal Court Judge Steve Bolstad
* Police Chief Jeff Newton
* Cascade County Attorney Josh Racki
* Pre-Release Director Alan Scanlon
* Sheriff Jesse Slaughter
* DEA Montana Resident Agent in Charge Stacy Zinn

After we have heard from the panelists, the audience will have the opportunity to ask questions.

Great Falls/Cascade County Still Stagnant

At last week’s Great Falls city commission meeting we voted to approve a $150,000 funding request, using federal ARPA funds, for the Great Falls International Airport.

The money will be used as part of a matching fund package for a Small Community Air Service Development Grant (SCASD) to help lower air fares at Great Falls’ airport.

I was happy to vote in favor of the request. But in reading the agenda report I was troubled, but not surprised, by the facts presented by John Faulkner, our airport Director:

“Twenty years ago, Cascade County was the third largest county in Montana. Since that time, we have grown only 1% in population.

Meanwhile, the next slowest growing large county grew at 26 times that rate! Gallatin County grew an amazing 72 times our growth rate.

Based on these growth rates, Helena is likely to outgrow Great Falls over the next ten years.

The picture is not much better economically.

Once Great Falls was in the middle of the pack of household income, Cascade County now has the lowest and slowest growing median household income of the larger counties.

The airlines cannot rely on growth in Great Falls. In fact, they can see the market is stagnant which makes them reluctant to invest in more flights, larger airplanes or new routes.”

Unfortunately, we’ve been hearing this same sad song for far too long.

Approving the funds for the matching SCASD grant is another small step in the right direction, but we need a lot more action.

What’s it going to take to finally change the tune? I’m all ears.

Great Falls Homeless Encampment A ‘Living Nightmare’ After Dark

Editors note – The following is the text of comments made during public comment at the 2/15/22 Great Falls City Commission meeting by a local citizen who lives in the same neighborhood as the First United Methodist Church.

“I’m a lifelong resident of Great Falls, MT. I grew up attending its schools, I graduated from Great Falls High, and I became a public school teacher myself. I’m also an ordained minister in my church. Two years ago, my wife and I bought our first house. It is a very modest home and we love it, but unfortunately for us it is located near the First United Methodist Church downtown.

The Methodist Church Homeless Encampment, for those of you who don’t have to live near it, is a living nightmare—especially after dark.

You will often find addicts there sleeping off drugs or alcohol, but also people shooting up, passing around bottles of booze, fighting, and screaming at the tops of their lungs at all hours of the night. My neighbors and I have called the police on the Encampment many times.

I’ve yet to witness a single arrest, or even heard of one being made. Because of this, the Methodist Encampment is a zone where disturbing the peace, public intoxication, and drug use have been essentially legalized. Thus, the encampment continues to attract many addicts and the mentally unstable.

We knew we weren’t moving into a wealthy neighborhood, but we had no idea we’d be living near an open-air homeless encampment. As residents of the neighborhood, we were never consulted about Reverend Wakeley’s decision to do this. None of us were ever asked by the church if this encampment was okay.

When we initially expressed our concerns about the encampment going unmonitored, we were informed that Reverend Wakeley expected us to act as his church’s surveillance crew, and to call him personally any time we witnessed illegal activity taking place. That way he could assess whether or not to trespass anyone off the property. So not only were we never asked about the encampment, the task of monitoring it got outsourced to us while the Reverend and the members of his congregation retired to their safe, quiet neighborhoods at night.

For the past year we have been forced to live with the consequences of the encampment, which means vagrants and drug addicts wandering up and down our streets at all hours of the day and night, often trespassing through our back yards, and stealing our property for drug money.

My wife and I chose to live in Great Falls because we thought it would be a safe place to raise our future children. After what we’ve been through dealing with men drunkenly stumbling to and from the Encampment, I would be concerned even letting a child play in my back yard. 

As part of my calling as an ordained minister, I’ve spent much of my life working with the homeless and in addiction recovery. I spent two years volunteering my time at churches, soup kitchens, homeless shelters, and drug detox programs in some of the most impoverished neighborhoods in New York City (the South Bronx and Harlem, among others). I also spent several years as the head teacher of a federal juvenile detention and drug rehabilitation facility, working with incarcerated youths who had committed federal crimes—many of them from Montana, and many of them drug-related.

I have nothing but love for the homeless and for those afflicted by the evils of drugs and addiction. But I firmly believe that the Methodist church’s current approach does far more harm than help.

This church and others like it are run by compassionate people who do not lack empathy, but who do lack life experience and a firm grasp on the reality of the situation for people like me who actually have to live in this neighborhood.

People may ask “What would Jesus do in this situation?” I can tell you: Jesus would heal these people of their pain, their mental health problems, and their addictions. And He still will, and is waiting with open arms to do so. But the so-called “progressive” view, that people have a right to sleep on the sidewalk, is not only legally devoid of any merit but is inhumane, indecent and dangerous. It is also immoral and deeply un-Christian.

Ask yourself why the church doesn’t open its doors to these people, instead encouraging them to sleep on concrete in sub-zero weather. I think the answer is obvious.

These people need help. The best thing we can do for them is hold them accountable and point them to the MANY mental health, housing, and addiction recovery resources available, NOT enable their destructive behavior by giving them a consequence-free zone that makes it easier for them to keep using.

This encampment solves nothing, helps no one, and exacerbates problems we already face. Such a disaster would never be allowed to operate in Fox Farm or Prospect Heights. It should not be allowed in our neighborhood just because our incomes are lower.

I urge Reverend Wakeley or the city to please shut it down and start treating our brothers and sisters like human beings, not exploiting their anguish and suffering as some kind of marketing campaign for their personal projects.  

Sincerely, Giordano Lahaderne”

Some Only See One Side Of The “Homeless Encampment” Problem

During the public comment portion of last night’s Great Falls City Commission meeting quite a few local residents got up and expressed their opinions on the “homeless encampment” at the First United Methodist Church.

You can view the video of the meeting here. Public comment begins at about 7 minutes 30 seconds into the meeting.

There are differing points of view on the nature and scope of the problem and both sides were represented in public comments.

On one side we have those who live and work in the area of the FUMC and who strongly believe that the church is enabling and encouraging a health and safety problem, creating an unnecessary hotspot for drug use, alcoholism, and crime.

On the other hand are those who feel that the church is only trying to fulfill it’s mission to the less fortunate because no one else will do so.

As I sat and listened to those in the second category I couldn’t help but think that I was being preached at and reproved for being an uncaring, mean person if I didn’t wholeheartedly agree with their brand of “compassion”.

I’m sorry to say that most, though not all, of the rhetoric coming from the “preachers” came across as smug, self-righteous, morally superior grandstanding offering no actual solutions, only finger pointing.

Accusing the City of Great Falls and the city commission of hard heartedness and failure when it comes to addressing local issues of poverty, addiction, and homelessness is absurd and, quite frankly, ignorant.

There are two problems in this situation – first, the larger, long-term issue of homelessness and it’s causes; and second, the immediate concern of a serious crime and safety issue in the neighborhood and community.

Why is it that some folks only want to acknowledge and demand that others deal with the first problem, while they themselves ignore the second?

There are two things that the City has the capacity and authority to do in relation to these two problems:

Number one is to enforce our public nuisance ordinances to protect the law abiding citizens, residents, and businesses adversely affected by the situation occurring on the FUMC property. The mission of the church doesn’t supersede or negate the rights of taxpayers to enjoy a safe, clean environment in which to live and work.

Number two, the City can, does, and will continue to administer federally distributed funding (CDBG, HOMES, ARPA etc.) to local organizations that routinely address a variety of social/community problems.

I support both of the above solutions and will continue to do so.

Instead of virtue signaling, crowing about their own “compassion”, and issuing vague platitudes about how “someone should do something about homelessness”, if the folks who spoke last night would come to the City with a solid plan and specific applications for funds they would find a willingness and readiness to help.

Heisler’s Generous Gift To GF Central High

Local Business Owners and Philanthropists Tom and Mary Jane Heisler Give $250,000 to Launch New Scholarship Endowment

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Jan. 24, 2022

Great Falls Central Catholic High School announces that alumnus Tom Heisler (’61) and his wife, Mary Jane, have donated $250,000 to the Catholic Foundation of Eastern Montana to launch the new Tom and Mary Jane Heisler Family Scholarship Endowment.

Heisler graduated in 1961 from Great Falls Central Catholic High School. He met his future wife, Mary Jane, while a student there, and several of his siblings attended Central as well. Tom and Mary Jane have owned several different businesses in Great Falls over the last 52 years and attribute much of their success to the education and support they received as students at Central. Even though, as Tom says, he was “not the best-behaved kid in school,” his teachers and coaches didn’t just tolerate him; they cared about him, took an active interest in him, and looked out for his future.

The Heislers invite others—especially those who had the good fortune of attending Central—to join them in supporting this endowment. The goal is to enable students whose families would otherwise be unable to afford the tuition to secure an excellent Catholic education for their high schoolers. Tom notes that “a Catholic education is one of the most thoughtful things you can do for young people.”

For more information, please contact Wes Ross, Advancement Director for Great Falls Central Catholic High School, at wross@greatfallscentral.org or (406) 216-3344 ext. 104.

###

The Catholic Foundation of Eastern Montana is an independent board-governed nonprofit which manages the 125+ permanent endowments that benefit Catholic parishes, schools, ministries, and other entities in Eastern Montana. For more information about the Foundation, contact Judy Held at 406-315-1765 or visit www.catholicfoundationmt.org.

Comparing Great Falls’ Economic Data To Rest Of State

This week I received and reviewed some of the latest economic data put out by Patrick Barkey and the Bureau of Business and Economic Research at the University of Montana.

Once again I found it interesting, and a little discouraging to be honest, to see how Great Falls/Cascade County is faring compared to other Montana cities and counties.

Here is some of the info and data:

Tracking economic growth in terms of total wages paid to payroll workers, inflation-corrected, shows the differences in growth in the current economic recovery between the state’s most populous counties, as well as the balance of the state. Since the latest data extend only to the second quarter of 2021, the growth shown in Figure 1 refers to the changes of fiscal year 2021 (July 2020-June 2021) compared to the previous fiscal year.

Figure 1. Growth in inflation-corrected wages, FY2020-21. Sources: U.S. Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Here is Barkey’s brief analysis of what is driving this economic data in Great Falls/Cascade County:

In past years, lower rates of population in-migration and a lower presence in faster growing professional services industries has produced slower growth in Cascade (Great Falls), Lewis and Clark (Helena) and Silver Bow (Butte) counties.

That story changed this year in Lewis and Clark County with the surge of federal spending helping raise total wages in the state’s capital region by $87 million in 2021. Past growth from new facilities, such as Boeing, fell back, while health care, as in so many other parts of the state, saw good growth.

Cascade County’s total wage growth of just under $30 million in 2021 had a bit more headwind, with declines in information (media), accommodations and food and professional business services more than offset by gains in construction, health care and government.

The announcement of the new medical school in Great Falls holds some promise for gains going forward, while the challenges for Montana agriculture weigh more heavily on this urban area.”

You can find more from Barkey’s report here.

Here’s to better times and a great 2022 for Great Falls, with expanding opportunities and prosperity for all of our citizens.

Great Falls City Commission Ignores Own Rules In City-County Board Of Health Reappointment

Rules? What rules?

I’ve been following the Great Falls City Commission for years and pointing out instances of, in my opinion, questionable conduct of business. I and others here in Great Falls would say the commission at times appears to make their own rules while ignoring city code when it suits them. The latest instance of this occurred at the December 21 city commission meeting. The city commission failed to follow its own codified procedure for city board appointees. I feel it warrants further scrutiny.

Appointment or reappointment of a city representative for the City-County Board of Health was on the agenda. The Board of Health, unlike most other local boards, is not merely advisory— it wields, or attempts to wield, regulatory power. Therefore, it is a very important position in our community.

The city commission reappointed Amanda Ball even though she didn’t submit an application for reappointment. The city also failed to advertise the position to the public to solicit for other applicants. To me, this is a clear example of the city doing what they please instead of what is required.

The procedure for board appointments is codified in Resolution 10235, Establishing a Policy Concerning Appointments to Boards and Commissions, which was passed by the city commission on June 5, 2018:

“In the case of a member eligible for and interested in reappointment, if the member is in good standing and the applicable board or commission recommends that the member be reappointed, his or her application shall be brought before the City Commission for consideration for reappointment without advertising for other citizen interest”

The Board of Health chose not to make any recommendation as is documented in the meeting agenda packet.

So then, in order to follow their own rules, the City of Great Falls should have advertised for applicants—but they didn’t.

They also failed to require Ball to bring forth an application for reappointment.

Most of the public, along with Commissioner Tryon who began his term in 2020 and newly appointed Commissioner Heinbauch, would have no way of knowing what Ball’s qualifications are, unless they accessed her original application from April 2019. Why not provide the commissioners and the public her application?

There were two other folks that sent in applications, even though the city didn’t open it up for applications as required. One applicant, Katrina Lewis, is a doctor and the other applicant, Jonathan Martin, a retired pharmaceutical representative. Their applications are attached to the meeting agenda packet found here:

https://mccmeetings.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/greatfls-pubu/MEET-Packet-f120724c58a140db8ae4e69899b7629a.pdf

Commissioner Robinson, who also serves on the Board of Health and is in fact, chair of that board, was the main proponent for Ball. The December 21 city commission meeting is posted at link below. The discussion about reappointment of Ball begins @ 00:13:00.

https://greatfallsmt.viebit.com/player.php?hash=pS5wqM3uGkne

At @ 00:16:00, Commissioner Tryon weighs in that the two other applicants deserve to be considered and brings up Resolution 10235. At @ 00:20:10 he asks the question of whether it is standard that the Board of Health doesn’t weigh in on appointment or reappointment of candidates to the board, to which Commissioner Robinson, at @ 00:20:24 states, “The answer is yes.”

But that is not true. The Board of Health has, in the past, weighed in on candidates.

For example, consideration for reappointment of Peter Gray, with the statement, “During the November 7, 2018 Board of Health meeting, the Board recommended reappointing Mr. Gray,” is found here:

https://greatfallsmt.net/sites/default/files/fileattachments/city_commission/meeting/packets/157301/agenda_2018_11_20_cc_meeting_packet_revised_3.pdf

And there are other examples as well, including Sue Ann Warren in 2008 and 2015. So Commissioner Robinson’s claim that the Board of Health’s policy is to refrain from recommending reappointment is blatantly false.

Also disappointing, with the exception of Commissioner Tryon, is that the commission appeared to accept Ball’s brief statement at the November 16 city commission meeting as equivalent to a written application.

I, along with many other city residents, wouldn’t consider an introduction by a city commissioner and a brief statement by a potential board candidate as an application. Indeed Commissioner Tryon made that very point.

Commissioner Robinson introduced Ball at the Nov 16 city commission Zoom meeting. She spoke briefly about wanting to remain on the board. By the way, this is listed in the meeting agenda as a Community Health Update, but I don’t consider it as such. It is Commissioner Robinson assisting Ball’s quest to be reappointed to the Board of Health. Here’s the link:

https://greatfallsmt.viebit.com/player.php?hash=ukwZ3BgrDmOl

At @ 00:12:07: Robinson stated:

“I hope that ah, I think the board of health, under, under my, ah, ah recommendation, will recommend her to be, re, re, ah, re, ah, removed, ah, re—there she is she’s on their right now—reappointed, and so Amanda if you could just unmute yourself and show your face if you can hear us. And there she is, good. I don’t know whether you heard anything I said, but it was all good things, so. Anyway, I’m hoping that Amanda, ah, will, that the city commission, ah, the first meeting in January will reappoint her for another two year term.”

At @ 00:12:50, Ball begins her statement. She stated she works professionally in child welfare for the State of Montana. Then goes on to offer the following:

“I want to be clear that I am not speaking as a representative of the State of Montana,” she stated. “I am only representing myself and what I’ve found to be true for the majority of the children I’ve interacted with.”

Ball follows this some time later with what might be the most revealing statement of all:

“It is rare to hear a child complaining about a mask or social distancing themselves.”

It seems to me then that her reappointment would maintain the status quo of the current Board of Health, as far as mask mandate decisions.


Interestingly, public comment was received about unsolicited applicant Dr. Katrina Lewis who appears to me to be highly qualified for appointment to the Board of Health. The comment, from a Kathy Davis, states:

“Please reappoint Amanda Ball for the BOH. It is crucial to have members of that board science based thinkers. Dr. Lewis has been vocal against mask wearing , and espouses conspiracy theories.”

That comment, which is part of the public record, is found here:

https://greatfallsmt.net/sites/default/files/fileattachments/city_commission/meeting/257158/fw_all_city_commissioners_board_of_health_appointment.pdf

These actions by the city bring up so many questions for me. Isn’t it a bit prejudiced to allow a city commissioner to personally introduce a potential board appointee and sing her praises? How can a commissioner who does that still be fair and balanced in order to vote on the matter? Doesn’t a personal recommendation by a commissioner give that person an unfair advantage over anyone else interested in the board position?

Further, Did Lewis’s unsolicited application contribute to the urgency in the city commission reappointment of Ball while Commissioner Robinson was still seated, instead of in January as originally proposed by Robinson at the November 16 commission meeting?

Are the city’s actions in this an indication that they will refuse to consider highly qualified applicants for the Board of Health, merely because those applicants are outspoken against mask mandates?

Sadly, as always, there was very little public comment at the December 21 commission meeting. Julie Bass makes her comment on reappointment beginning @ 00:27:04 and is summarily chastised by Mayor Kelly about using a good-old-boy reference. So much for free speech. My comment begins @ 00:44:41.

‘White Lives Matter’ Comes To Great Falls

Yesterday I received some photos from a local resident showing handbills posted in Great Falls promoting a ‘White Lives Matter’ agenda.

I’ve included the pictures in this piece.

I was troubled by the pictures. Just as I was troubled by some of the incendiary and hateful messages at the ‘Defund The Police/BLM’ rallies in Great Falls in 2020 with signs that read ‘Fuck the Police’ and ‘ACAB’ (All Cops Are Bad), referring to our own Great Falls police officers.

Even though the message on the handbills is controversial and divisive, as it’s obviously intended to be, it is protected speech so that is not what bothered me the most.

At first blush my concern was that someone in my community, OUR community, would take the time and effort to so thoroughly stir up such division and racial animus.

But then I saw an article in the Helena Independent Record reporting that the White Lives Matter group staged a rally in Helena on Saturday as part of a statewide ‘Day of Action’ and that the participants drove in from other parts of the state‘ and that out-of-state groups have been ‘…hosting WLM rallies and engaging in WLM flyer distributions across the nation since 2015.’

So it appears fairly certain that this is not a homegrown Great Falls effort.

That makes sense to me, because I know my hometown and the people here. We are a good and decent community filled with kind and loving folks who treat each other with respect.

Sure, there are dark corners and hateful ideologies on the far fringes of both sides of the political/cultural spectrum here, but the overwhelming majority of our Great Falls family wants nothing more than to live and let live, lend a helping hand whenever possible, and raise our kids in a safe environment.

So my message to any out-of-towners coming here to whip up trouble, regardless of political ideology: We don’t want or need you here. Stay away.

By the way, the handbills have been reported to the police – not because of the message but because plastering handbills without permission is defacement of someone else’s property.

Great Falls Dem Bessette Says She’s ‘Hope Made Flesh’

Last week E-City Beat published a piece about the Great Falls Tribune’s fawning coverage of all things Democrat in which they promoted a fluff piece on local Dem candidate for the state legislature in House District 24, Barbara Bessette.

We linked our piece on our ECB Facebook page and a reader commented on it with the following screenshot of a Tweet by Bessette:

Does Bessette actually believe herself to be ‘hope made flesh’ and a ‘victory against colonialism & attempted genocide’?

If so, we wonder how that belief will translate into policy if she is elected to the Montana State Legislature and how those policies would benefit voters in HD24 who don’t fall into her preferred category of racial victimhood in the 21st Century.

People are sick and tired of the politics of division so it’s doubtful that Bessette’s true colors will have much appeal with Great Falls voters. We shall see.

As the 2022 election approaches and politicians like Bessette try to craft their most favorable image to the public, E-City Beat will be informing voters about what those local candidates said and did when they thought no one was paying attention.

We have loads of examples and are looking forward to sharing them with our readers.