Time

_______________________________________________________________________

Of the many wonders of our existence, time and free will rank at the top of the list. What is most important is how we use them.

The theme here is not that we should choose to make better use of our time, but rather how the Great Falls Public School District and the Great Falls City Commission use both time and choice to their advantage, and often not, for those they are supposed to serve.

Self-preservation and advancement are strong motivators, which can result in cronyism, hiding information, and corruption. Even in a small community such as ours, these acts go unnoticed to most citizens except a few, or those directly affected. In the absence of investigative journalism, the problem is even more hidden and accountability is non-existent.

For those who may not know how our elected officials and administrators use time and free will to their advantage, let’s take a little trip back into history.

Recently, when several sitting city commissioners were found to have rewarded their friends and families in the award of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds their stated defenses went something like this:

“Great Falls is a small community and everyone knows someone.”

“But my wife works in a different part of the organization than the part which was applying for the grant.”

And so on. These public officials were admonished by the Department of Housing and Urban Development – the federal agency responsible for administering the CDBG program, and local funds were withdrawn. The Mayor’s response was – “let’s just move on”.

In other words, time is on our side and people will forget. Yes, time can be a huge ally.

Time was also used as an ally by the Great Falls Public School District when the Building and Grounds Department was rocked by charges that the supervisor was using district resources to his own benefit. An investigation ensued, the supervisor resigned under pressure, and the case was closed and sealed to protect the individual’s privacy.

How about the taxpayer’s right to know if a crime was committed? Was the whole affair just swept under the rug with the hope that with the passing of time, the public will forget? Was the district’s attitude – let’s just move on?

When a school board trustee sits on a private company’s board of directors with another board member who she votes to award a school contract to, not once but twice, is that serving herself, or helping a friend? But what the heck, let’s just move on, right?

And what about the fact that the current superintendent, Tammy Lacey, participated in the architectural selection process for both new elementary schools totaling over $30M, while her ex-husband is employed by the architectural firm selected?

How about the locker room hazing incident referred to as “power gobbling” at Great Falls High School, which was reported as a sexual assault and not reported to the police for almost two months after the student’s family first brought it to the staff’s attention?

Information obtained from the student’s family indicate that at least two members of the Great Falls High counseling staff were advised of the incident on September 15, 2011 and yet the Great Falls Police Department was not notified until October 30, 2011.

According to the Montana ACLU website a school becomes legally responsible when the school’s response to harassment “is clearly unreasonable in light of the known circumstances.”

Was a 45 day delay in reporting the assault “clearly unreasonable”? You be the judge.

The Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network website on the “Mandatory Reporting Requirements: Children Montana” page states that reports are required to be made promptly.

One of the two GFHS staff members seemingly involved in the non-reporting of the sexual assault was later promoted to principal at Great Falls High, and is now about to be hired as the new assistant superintendent of secondary education for the school district.

Of course the district’s investigation report is sealed due to attorney-client privilege. What are they hiding?

Obviously, both the City Commissioners and the school district are familiar with Mick Jagger and the Rolling Stones’ song – “Time is on My Side”, with the Bob Marley refrain – “Every Little Thing is Going to be Alright”.

________________________________________________________________________

 

Great Falls: ‘You Can’t Do That’ Or ‘How Can We Help You Do That?’

_______________________________________________________________________

In a previous article, “A Development Process Advisory Board For Great Falls Makes Sense”, I explored some of the ways a DPARB could be beneficial for growth and development in Great Falls, as it has been in Billings.

Today I want to look at what I consider to be the most important thing our city government and city officials can do to help Great Falls go from struggling to remain stagnant to once again becoming the envy of Montana’s cities.

And here it is in a nutshell:

From the mayor and city commission to the various department heads and other city employees, when dealing with business and development issues the motto and attitude for all city public officials and staff should always be, “How can we serve you and help you succeed?” and not, “You can’t do that!”

We have a ways to go yet in order to instill that attitude into our city government’s bloodstream. It starts at the top, but unfortunately our city commission has missed the mark badly and repeatedly.

The M&D Construction debacle is just one example of why Great Falls has gained the much-deserved reputation of being an anti-business, anti-development community.

M&D Construction moved out of the city when our city commission unanimously voted against a conditional use permit for the company which employed around 30 people.

This anti-business, anti-jobs unanimous decision by the five Great Falls city commissioners, Kelly, Bronson, Moe, Houck and Robinson, against the conditional use permit was made even though City staff, the City Zoning Commission and Neighborhood Council 7 all voted unanimously IN FAVOR of it.

You can find all the sad details about the M&D decision in the minutes, video and further documentation here.

We’ve allowed wealthy old-money elites, who are pals with and campaign donors to sitting city commissioners, to have veto power over local business development and expansion. If this kind of high-level cronyism isn’t stopped once and for all in Great Falls we will never reach our potential.

While I believe we need a radical change in the way we do business and the way our city commission has incompetently and dishonestly operated recently, the changes and continued improvements in policies at the department level, where the rubber meets the road, don’t need to be revolutionary, just based in common sense.

I honestly think we have seen some progress and improvements over the past ten years or so in Great Falls when it comes to our business and development processes. But we can do better, in Some cases a lot better.

Here are three ideas for continued improvement (with plenty more to come):

  • One of the main complaints I’ve heard from developers over the years is that they have to call or visit multiple city departments to mitigate issues for a single project. A better solution would be to have one certain point of contact within the city for development issues. Having one city contact from the beginning stages of a project all the way through completion would help guide the developer through the process and greatly increase customer satisfaction.
  • Streamline the overall development process by improving the project review process. Either do away with the Design Review Board, which is currently suspended, or make it completely optional. The added expense and time involved for developers is an unnecessary burden and hassle for design issues that could be addressed in city code.
  • Make a verifiable document trail signed onto by city staff for every step of the development process required, including inspections and permitting. Having such a record for each project readily available, preferably online, would insure against future disagreements and misunderstandings between city staff/officials and developers. It would also provide accountability and transparency.

The City of Great Falls has undertaken various versions of some of these ideas and others but I don’t think we have made enough solid progress yet. Let’s keep the ball rolling and the ideas for solutions coming.

It all starts at the leadership level and with the right attitude.

________________________________________________________________________

 

Great Falls Road Conditions, Part II

_______________________________________________________________________

See Part I here.

Spring has arrived and the snow is melting. Which is worse? The snow and ice packed roads or the slush and refreeze? Either way, it calls attention to the City’s need to revise the current snow and ice removal and control plans.

But let’s talk springtime roads… And potholes. We all know where I come from, Pothole central. With the use of salt and other ice control products, potholes are a natural occurrence. Or so I thought. There are more potholes here than I ever saw in my suburban home town.

Potholes aren’t caused by the use of ice melting products as much as they are caused by the rapid expansion and contraction of water in its frozen state. It seeps into visible and invisible cracks where it freezes and expands. Then it thaws and seeps even further. Repeat this throughout the winter and eventually you have a wicked pothole. Basic middle school science.

By not properly removing snow, our roads are at even higher risk of potholes over the next few weeks as we experience frozen nights and spring like days. How does the City plan to handle this? A well functioning city would respond to a pothole call within 24 hours.

I’ve been fighting with the same pothole at the edge of my driveway for over 2 years now. I’m sure it’s been there longer than that though. I am certain that many of you have a hatred or these tire and axle destroyers just as I do.

With a strong desire from the community to review and revise the snow and ice removal plan, the City needs to listen. Snow removal and potholes are related and the cost of each need to be taken into consideration with such an action.

The City needs to repave so many streets, not to mention making the crosswalks ADA compliant and relaying all sidewalks. This alone would cost us hundreds of thousands in taxes and possibly grants.

This would also result in probably millions being needed in the end because they would have to replace the storm and sewage drains under many roads they repaved. Do you know how much of that could have been avoided if proper snow removal techniques had been applied from the start?

The road conditions in Great Falls are pretty intense. I believe it to be a misappropriation of taxpayer funds. The City Streets Department only received enough tax money to pay the wages and salaries of department employees.

All road work of any kind is almost completely non-funded. Barely even getting donations or grants. Either the City is just that broke, or… based on the fact that the city budget is available online for public access, you can infer that fund misappropriation is the better culprit. Our city officials should be ashamed of themselves.

________________________________________________________________________

 

Score One For Transparency

_______________________________________________________________________

As most local folks in Cascade County are now aware, former Cascade County Sheriff’s Office undersheriff John Stevens has been charged with felony theft related to public property, firearms, he allegedly absconded from the sheriffs office and traded for a four wheeler.

Of course Stevens is presumed innocent unless proven otherwise.

I would like to focus on something other than the details of this particular story and look at a broader issue and some possible lessons we can learn here.

We often wonder why Great Falls/Cascade County seems to be struggling to remain stagnant while other state and regional cities are growing and prospering.

I have long maintained that part of the reason for our economic and cultural stupor is a general anti-business and development attitude, and policies that go along with that from our local public officials.

But another factor contributing to our failure to progress and grow here is a longtime culture of cronyism and a lack of transparency as it relates to public officials and employees and the processes involved in our local government and public institutions.

Some examples:

  • For years, maybe decades, there were major conflicts of interest in the Great Falls city commission and city advisory boards surrounding the Community Development Block Grant money allocation. The public knew little if anything about these shenanigans until very recently and only because citizens starting speaking up and demanding change.
  • The Great Falls Public School District covered up the theft of public property by a district employee several years ago and also tried to sweep some very disturbing rape allegations at Great Falls High School under the rug. (I’m told to stay tuned for a more detailed reference to the rape allegation in an upcoming piece.)
  • Remember Electric City Power? The details of that fiasco and the incompetence and possible dirty dealings of those involved with it were largely unknown to the general public until it was too late.
  • Even now there are lots of questions about how transparent Cascade County officials have been in the Madison Food Park (slaughterhouse) development.

Enough said.

Okay, now for the good news – I am very impressed with Sheriff Jesse Slaughter and Undersheriff Cory Reeves and how they have conducted the peoples business over the last 3 months. As soon as the states DCI investigation into Stevens, and possibly others, was concluded Sheriff Slaughter sent out a press release and conducted a press conference fully open to the public with the details.

The law enforcement community is a very tight knit group and they take care of their own, sometimes possibly at the expense of honesty, transparency and fairness.

How easy it would have been for Slaughter to minimize and try to cover up, as much as possible, the charges against a fellow law enforcement officer. But he didn’t.

Back during the 2018 campaign for sheriff, Slaughter and Reeves reached out to me and asked to meet for a cup of coffee. I was a little surprised by the invitation and asked why. I was told that since I am known as a vocal opponent of the local good ol’ boys & gals club  they wanted to assure me that they were running on a platform of transparency and zero tolerance for cronyism.

So far so good in my opinion. I hope the example being set by the new sheriff and his administration will be an example and the start of a new way of doing business in Cascade County and Great Falls.

________________________________________________________________________

 

Local GOP Response To Hagan Press Release Too Personal

_______________________________________________________________________

Yesterday we received a letter from Michael Polaske, Chairman of the Cascade County Republican Central Committee Nominating Committee, in response to the press release we published on Monday from Roger Hagan.

We will not be publishing Polaske’s response at this time due to the nature of the content of the letter. Almost every other sentence is a personal attack on Mr. Hagan rather than a reasoned and logical response to the facts and content of Hagan’s press release, which did not mention any individual in the CCRCC by name.

We strive to be fair and will be happy to publish a response from Mr. Polaske or anyone else from the CCRCC as long as it isn’t a thinly veiled personal attack on Hagan, or anyone else, but addresses the issues.

We are not adverse to criticisms of public officials or elected representatives, Hagan is neither.

________________________________________________________________________

 

State GOP Smacks Down Local Central Committee

_______________________________________________________________________

PRESS RELEASE FROM ROGER A. HAGAN ON RULING BY REPUBLICAN PARTY ON CASCADE COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE RULES

I am pleased to announce the Montana Republican Party has issued an important decision nullifying rules intended to prevent reform of the Cascade County Republican Central Committee (CCRCC).

Last week, a subcommittee of the Montana Republican Party Rules Committee determined all rule changes to county rules made by the CCRCC Executive Board from June 2018 to the present are null and void. The ruling was made in response to a challenge I submitted to the Montana Republican Party on March 8, 2019 on behalf of ALL Cascade County Republicans.

The rules, nullified by the Montana Republican Party, include rules allowing the use of unauthorized proxies in the county convention, rules designed to remove duly elected committeemen and committeewomen from their positions, and rules requiring people challenging members of the current executive board at the convention to submit a petition for consideration for an executive board position at least 30 days in advance of the convention.

These rules were adopted in secret meetings occurring in December 2018 and February 2019. The rules were adopted without notice to the duly elected committeemen and committeewomen.

The rules adopted were nothing more than an attempt by the CCRCC Executive Board to restrict the vote at the County Convention and to prevent the duly elected committeemen and committeewomen from exercising their right to represent their constituents and elect a new executive board.

I am delighted the Montana Republican Party has decided to crack down on the Cascade County Republican Central Committee.

Although we have won this battle, I expect that we are going to continue to see more efforts to undermine the will of the people and to stop the duly elected committeemen and committeewomen from electing officers of the executive board. I would hope that I am wrong.

Nonetheless, today is good day for those who believe in ethical and transparent political parties and the voice of ALL Republicans in Cascade County. A central committee should not be allowed to write rules in secret and attempt to impose them on duly elected officials in an effort to control a central committee.

Attached is a copy of the decision. Please contact me for any information about this decision.

#######

Contact Info: Roger A. Hagan, rahagan@msn.com, (406) 459-0773

________________________________________________________________________

 

A Development Process Advisory Board For Great Falls Makes Sense

_______________________________________________________________________

In the introduction to my series, “Ideas For A Greater Great Falls”, under the category of Creating an environment for more jobs, higher wages and a vibrant, growing community, the second bullet point is the following:

    • Create a Development Process and Advisory Review Board along the lines of the Billings model.

The Billings Development Process and Advisory Review Board, DPARB, has been in place for about a decade now and continues to work quite well by most accounts for the growing city of Billings. I think we could and should adopt and adapt a similar board to address issues surrounding the development process here in Great Falls.

Here are few of the features and details of the the Billings model taken from the City of Billings web site and the Billings DPARB PDF.

“DPARB Purpose
  • To act as an advisory board to the City Administrator in regards to the entire development process, its related policies, and procedures.
  • To review and evaluate the administration of the development process.
  • To review and evaluate policies that affect the development process.
  • To serve as an appeals board for development issues that are not addressed by existing procedures, rules, or regulations.”

Ideally such a board for Great Falls would work either as an official City Advisory Board or as an advisory panel to the City Manager. I prefer the former. Now would be a good time to consider this idea because the Design Review Board has been suspended temporarily, permanently would be better in my opinion.

The Great Falls Design Review Board has been, in the opinion of many, a hindrance to development because of the extra time and expense  project developers are forced to incur due to DRB requirements .

A DPARB would be a different kind of board. Instead of being another regulatory hoop to jump through it would serve as a panel to help developers and it would act as a citizens mitigation board, advocate for developers large and small, and an appeal mechanism for unaddressed issues between city staff and project developers.

Here is a summary of the Billings DPARB purpose:

“Will hear all appeal issues not covered by other mandated City, County, State or Federal regulations, codes, ordinances or laws. If you feel there is a problem with the timeliness consistency or cooperation with City staff, please complete and submit the Appeal or Review Request form on the reverse side.”

View the Billings DPARB PDF here.

It would be very important that members of a Great Falls DPARB be make up of regular citizens and folks from the local construction/development, business, and real estate industries who must deal daily with city development policies and regulations and the consequences of flaws and miscommunication in our local development process.

We would need to give a lot of thought to how we would appoint members, but I would prefer to see at least half of the members appointed by means other than nominations done solely by City Commissioners. Maybe Neighborhood Councils or business and development could nominate people.

Here are the objectives outlined for the Billings DPARB:

“To accomplish its purpose DPARB has two objectives: 

  1. To provide a forum for review and discussion of the policies, rules, regulations and procedures associated with the City’s development process and
  2. to provide an appeal process that addresses the timeliness, consistency or cooperation with City staff as it relates to the City’s development policies rules regulations and procedures.”

In conclusion, a Great Falls DPARB would go a long way in making sure that we complete the transformation from “You can’t do that here” to “How can we help you succeed” when it comes to Great Falls’ local development regulations and process. We should be willing, and even eager, to look at what other state and regional communities are doing to gain success and not be too proud to adopt those ideas.

Let me know your ideas.

________________________________________________________________________

 

No One Told Me There Would Be Math

_______________________________________________________________________

Here’s a public service announcement we think could be a very helpful local learning resource – math tutoring for local students.

According to Malachy Horning from Central Assembly of God in Great Falls, “Central Assembly has a tutoring center with 10 computers and supervision. Our youth pastor is a math genius and we have a couple teachers that would help if we were to get the students to come.”

We think this is just dandy, help spread the word.

________________________________________________________________________

 

Electric City Voices On Local Jobs

_______________________________________________________________________

Earlier today I saw the following meme/comment on a popular Great Falls public Facebook page, Remember Great Falls When

What I found particularly interesting were the comments posted by local citizens and employers. You can click here to see all of the comments, but I’ve copied a few excerpts here that are very revealing and highlight a few of our major challenges in Great Falls.

Michael – “Unemployment in Great Falls is at 4%. I own a local business and I can’t find any qualified people to work for us. We have to look out of state. There’s not enough workers, especially skilled workers in Great Falls for the jobs that are required. We’ve had companies look at Great Falls and after looking at the lower unemployment and the skill level they back out.”

Todd – “Good, skilled employees with work ethic are so hard to recruit locally. Makes it very difficult to operate a business in Great Falls.”

Lori – “The wages are unrealistic and insulting here for the cost of living and prices of EVERYTHING. My skills and work ethics are EXEMPLARY but the jobs & realistic wages are not here for me. GF is letting me down.”

Ken – “…it is the low waves paid by people knowing that workers will take much less just to have access to Montana’s outdoors and recreation opportunities. How many tourists have you met that moved here expecting to find cheap land and the ability to ‘live’ off of it on the cheap?
I have met hundreds. The woman gets a job in town and the guy builds canoes, or works at a ski area in exchange for a season pass or just hunts and fishes. While attempting to qualify for SSI Disability.”

Robert“Retired military can live on minimum wage jobs that’s one reason businesses in Great Falls offer poor wages quality people require about twice minimum wage…”

Keith“I reluctantly left Great Falls specifically because of the lack of work.

I stayed a lot longer than I should have and lived lean for way too long.

All these many years later I am plotting my return (to Montana, not necessarily Great Falls) within a year and a half & I can’t wait to get back home in Montana where I belong.”

Nikki“You can drive down 10th n see tons of help wanted signs.. but after applications r in they never call.. I have had 4 different kids putting in apps n never a call back.. they have to start somewhere not everyone can be college educated.. I have 2 kids (young adults now)that are work horses.. will do anything for anyone.. can only find part time jobs.. they have all pounded the pavement.. they r off the couch n games n TVs.. where r these jobs that really hire?”

Mary – “…We left Great Falls and then came back and the company I was working for closed up, I went to work for another company and they closed up, my husband worked for a company that closed up, my son owns a Carlot they closed up, our friends owned car lots that closed up, my son-in-law works for batteries warehouse and they closed up, we have many, many, many friends that moved over to Spokane area to get work and have good lives!

We got good jobs here because we weren’t lazy enough to just sit around to try to make ends meet in Great Falls. We got good jobs that were lasting and didn’t close their doors and we were able to retire from those jobs. My children still work at the good jobs here in our area.

We are from Great Falls Montana and didn’t want to have to leave, but we had no choice, it was either live on minimum wage at McDonald’s or get off our asses and find a job in another state and that’s what we did!

Great Falls is a military retirement city, there’s nothing for young people to do there. I go there and I feel depressed because of all the gambling and everyone sit in the bar’s drinking Free beer/wine and Gambling in the bars all day, I can’t wait to get home. But I have family and friends there that I want to go and visit so we still visit once a year for a couple of days.

Great Falls used to be a blooming beautiful city and then I was proud to live in, it’s a dying old town now that needs the military to keep it going.
I’m glad that I’m from there, but None of us that we moved over here would ever want to go back and live there again.”

You get the idea. For too many years our so-called leadership here has focused on making sure we have a thriving poverty industry and little else. What did we think was going to happen?

________________________________________________________________________

 

Ideas For A Greater Great Falls: Introduction

_______________________________________________________________________

In my most recent article here on E-City Beat I said I would be doing a series of articles focusing on what we can do to build a better Great Falls by looking at what other Montana cities are doing to grow and develop while we struggle to remain stagnant. In other words, what are we not doing that maybe we should be, and what are we doing that maybe we should not be?

There is a lot of ground to cover so I’ll be developing a series of easily digestible sized pieces over a several month period of time. In this first piece in the series I’d like to present a rough overview of what I’ll be covering going forward. There are four main areas to look at with several sub-topics and general ideas for improving our city.

1.  Create an environment for more jobs, higher wages and a vibrant, growing community.

    • Work towards less red tape and fewer regulatory ‘hoops’ for businesses and citizens, partly by a line-by-line review of city code and policy.
    • Create a Development Process and Advisory Review Board along the lines of the Billings model.
    • The motto and attitude for all city public officials and staff should always be, “How can we serve you and help you succeed?” and not, “You can’t do that!”
    • Economic development should not be the sole domain of the Great Falls Development Authority which has no public accountability and very little oversight. Look at ways to create competition in the business of economic development in Great Falls.
    • Develop, attract, and maintain a quality local workforce.

2. Safe streets and neighborhoods.

    • Review and revise if necessary city public disorderly conduct, panhandling, and vagrancy ordinances and strictly enforce them.
    • More police foot patrols downtown and in high crime areas.
    • Prioritize funding of the Great Falls Police Department, adding the necessary resources and personnel to meet the demands of increasing crime.  

The motto and attitude for all city public officials and staff should always be, “How can we serve you and help you succeed?” and not, “You can’t do that!”

3. Zero tolerance for conflicts of interest in our city government and demand transparency and honesty at all times.

    • Prohibit any employee or board member of any organization receiving taxpayer funds or resources from serving on the committee/board that recommends or approves allocation of those funds or resources.
    • Term limits for Great Falls city commissioners and mayor.
    • Require all local elected and appointed public officials to fill out and sign annual conflict of interest forms and agreements.
    • Require the mayor and city commissioners to make public on the city website a list of any of their personal potential conflicts of interest. This would include business/professional associations and clients, personal and family member affiliations with organizations who lobby the city for resources, and campaign donors who do business with the city or seek official consideration from the Commission.
    • When the 10 year local government review and vote comes up again we should seriously consider switching to a precinct/ward system, rather than the current at-large system. for electing city commissioners. At the same time we should consider electing a mayor who would also serve as a paid city manager with direct voter accountability.

 4. Encourage more civic involvement from the public by making City resources, meetings and processes more transparent and accessible through proactive, improved communications and public relations methods.

    • Allow Great Falls citizens to participate in city commission and other public meetings in real time via social media and email.
    • Explore the possibility of setting meeting times for all city boards and councils at times most convenient for the public to attend and make participation by members and the public available via real-time technologies like Twitter, Skype, and teleconferencing.
    • Allow Great Falls citizens to use Power Point presentations and other visual/technology aids at city commission regular and work session meetings just as city staff is allowed to do.

Note – some of the conflicts of interest items under #3 have been started and implemented, but only because of citizens speaking up and demanding change, not because of any real desire or initiative on the part of the mayor or commissioners to require accountability.

In the next piece I’ll be looking at the Development Process Review and Advisory Board concept, how it’s worked in Billings and how we could adopt something similar here in Great Falls.

________________________________________________________________________