Former Montana Chamber Of Commerce Chair Endorses Rosendale Plan

Donald J. Sterhan is the President and CEO of Mountain Plains Equity Group. He has previously served as Chairman of the Montana Chamber of Commerce, President of the Montana Chamber Foundation, on the White House Conference on Small Business, and as a member of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Board of Directors.

Rosendale’s plan will get Montana’s economy back on track

By Donald J. Sterhan

There’s no question that we’re facing unprecedented challenges in today’s economy.  From job losses and disruptions in education, to deferred payments, business closures and even bankruptcies, it’s clear we have a lagging economy that is stumbling along in uncertainty.  On that much, I think most all of us can agree.   But where we seem to disagree is in identifying the steps needed to set a new course and get us back on the pathway to economic recovery and growth. 

As a lifelong Montanan with a business career spanning over 35 years in the Treasure state, I must admit that I often see the health and welfare of our local business community as a good barometer of the opportunities available to our citizens.  If we are to achieve growth in our economy and stimulate tax revenues to fuel our schools and public services, then we must rely on a vibrant business community that promotes more jobs, better wages, and the spirit of entrepreneurship.  This result doesn’t happen by chance – it only happens with leadership. 

It is for this reason that I was pleased to see Matt Rosendale step forward this past week in a very public way to take the initiative and offer leadership in this debate over the next best steps.   Last week I participated in a roundtable discussion that Rosendale hosted with business leaders from around Montana, with a variety of industries represented including retail, construction, agriculture, healthcare, financial services, and tourism.  Rosendale convened the roundtable to listen to specific issues affecting each of our industries as a result of COVID-19, and to discuss any ways that we felt the federal government could make it easier on businesses during these challenging times.

Over the course of the conversation, it became clear to me that Rosendale draws on his own experience as a businessman, with much success to his credit in growing his family’s small business, creating jobs, and signing both sides of a paycheck.  But even more impressive is his willingness to listen – and it’s a refreshing quality.

This quality is evident in Matt Rosendale’s “Plan to Reignite Our Economy”.  I’ve reviewed this plan and believe it’s right on the mark. 

The plan that he released addresses many of the concerns we shared with him at the roundtable, from liability protections for businessowners, to incentivizing employees to return to work, to rolling back crushing federal regulations and taxes.  It’s apparent to me that Rosendale and his team have worked overtime to consolidate the various business issues and recommendations into an organized and bold plan to rebuild our economy, unleash growth, foster job creation, and promote innovation in Montana.  

Now that’s leadership.  Especially in these uncertain times, that’s the brand of leadership from our public officials that is critically important.   In Congress, in the legislature, and in local municipalities, we need leaders with a clear understanding of the challenges facing businesses.  Matt Rosendale has demonstrated to me that he is indeed that type of leader.

University Of Portland Removes Corps Of Discovery Statue

After we published our two opinion pieces from this week (Should Lewis & Clark’s Names & Statues Be Removed? and Pastor Collins Responds To Lewis & Clark Statue Question) concerning statues and monuments memorializing Lewis and Clark, a reader posted in our comments section this link to an article in the online Oregonian dated June 17, 2020:

https://www.oregonlive.com/news/2020/06/university-of-portland-takes-down-statue-of-lewis-clark-slave-york.html

The article states, “The University of Portland has removed one figure from its Captain William Clark Monument on its North Portland campus.”

After a little further digging we discovered an update to the statue removal on the KBND Radio Regional News website which states, “The University of Portland has removed the statue of explorer William Clark from its campus.  The school took down the statue yesterday along with the corresponding statues depicting his slave, York, and an indigenous person.  University officials say the statue has been vandalized recently and that it was time for the statues to come down anyway.

The KBND news piece is dated June 19, 2020, two days after the Oregonian article date.

MT Senate District 10 GOP Primary: Fitzpatrick & Dodd

E-City Beat emailed local Montana legislative candidates who are in primaries requesting responses to three questions, which you’ll see below. Ballots for the June primary are currently arriving in mailboxes.

Today we are publishing responses from GOP candidates for SD 10, Steve Fitzpatrick and Jeni Dodd. Ms. Dodd didn’t include a photo with her response. Stay tuned this week for more candidate responses.

Steve Fitzpatrick

Why Are You Running for The Office?

I am running for reelection because I want to make Montana the best place to live, start a business, and raise a family. Montana is facing some serious challenges. We need leaders who have the experience and willingness to do the right thing to move Montana forward.

In politics today, we spend too much time asking whether a political party or special interest wins or loses. We need to stop that. I believe we should ask whether the people of Montana win or lose.

I believe in the importance of working together to find solutions to the challenges we face. In the 2019 session, I worked with a broad coalition of legislators to pass meaningful legislation to improve access to healthcare and to lower the cost of prescription drugs, to protect property and water rights, and to improve our business environment. In total, I sponsored and passed 31 pieces of legislation, the most of any legislator.

If reelected, I will continue to work with others to find solutions to the problems we face. You can count on me to represent you and put the interests of Montanans first.

Why are You Running as a Republican?

I am a Republican because I believe in the core values – limited government, improved economic opportunity, fiscally responsible government, and the belief in the dignity and worth of every individual — which have guided our party for over 150 years.

As your Senator, I have worked to eliminate unnecessary regulation, to improve opportunities for Montana businesses, and to encourage responsible natural resource development.

I believe in the importance of being a good steward of public resources. The Legislature should only spend for money for services we actually need and never tolerate any waste, fraud, or abuse in state government.

I believe in the importance of agriculture, property rights, and Second Amendment rights and in ensuring all Montanans have access to affordable, quality healthcare. As your Senator, I will continue to work to improve Montana and to ensure a better future for you and your family.

What Makes You the Best Candidate in the Race?

I am the candidate who will represent you, not the special interests or the party bosses. I have a conservative voting record and a proven record of working to find common sense solutions. As your Senator, I will do what is best for the people of Cascade County.

I have been named a Montana Chamber of Commerce Champion of Business, have an “A” rating from the Montana Farm Bureau Federation, and a 100% score with the Montana Family Foundation. However, this election is about more than voting records. It is about electing a person who represents the values of the district.

I believe in the importance of hard work, personal responsibility, and living within our means. I will support legislation which protects and enhances our community and the State of Montana. I will not support legislation that does otherwise. You can count of me to stand up for better jobs and a strong economy, improved access to healthcare, fiscally responsible government, and a better future for Montana.

Jeni Dodd

Why are you running for the office?

I’ve achieved some results as a local activist, but I believe I can accomplish more as a legislator helping form policy, rather than merely opposing or defending existing policy. What I hope to accomplish is legislation that will do the following: reduce government overreach, particularly that which affects small businesses/independent contractors; shrink government waste; protect and defend our inalienable rights; decrease the tax burden on Montana residents; and provide for private property rights protections, including protections from regulatory takings such as unreasonable restrictions and ordinances. I would also examine what is and isn’t working well for our state and push for change, but change that is consistent with our founding documents.

Why are you running as a Republican?

I’m running as a Republican because I share the values stated in our party’s platform and will uphold those values. I also believe that the Republican party is more aligned with our Constitutional Republic. Ben Franklin was right when he stated, “A Republic, if you can keep it.” The Republican party seems to want to “keep it.”

I’m also running because it’s been disappointing to me to see local members of our party, the “Solutions Caucus,” consistently vote against Republican and Constitutional values in the Montana Legislature. It seems to me that the Solutions Caucus, in joining with Democrats, have abandoned both critical thinking and the party platform. My opponent is a leading member of that caucus. Republicans that vote with Democrats and against the values our party holds dear—limited government, sanctity of life, inalienable rights enumerated in the Constitution, less taxes, etc.—are truly not Republicans.

The Democrat party didn’t run a candidate in Senate District 10, perhaps because they know they can count on my opponent, the incumbent, to vote with them.

What makes you the best candidate in the race?

More than a dozen political action committees have donated to my opponent. My campaign has received no PAC donations. I am funded by individuals and will represent the voters, not special interests. I’m endorsed by Montanans for Limited Government and Legistats. They know I’m the best candidate in this primary because I would more faithfully represent Republican and Constitutional values than my opponent.

Two Polls On Opening State & Local Economy & Schools

Montana Governor Steve Bullock has announced that the state will begin easing restrictions put in place due to COVID-19 starting this coming Sunday and Monday, April 26 & 27, with churches and retail businesses allowed to re-open.

This will be followed by bars and restaurants having the green light to open up on May 4.

The Governor has left it up to local school districts to decide whether to open schools back up. The Great Falls Public School board is seeking input on the issue from local parents and will be meeting this Monday evening, May 27.

Click here to read the key points and criteria for Montana’s Phase One Re-opening for churches, businesses and schools.

Please take a minute to weigh in on our poll questions.

[poll id=”20″]

[poll id=”21″]

A-Listers, Big Tech Execs, Billionaires, And DC Insiders: Meet Whitney Williams’ Donors

Not too long ago, we wrote about Democratic gubernatorial candidate Whitney Williams’ massive fundraising efforts, and the fact that more than three quarters of her haul originates from big money donors outside of Montana.

Given the extreme disparity between Williams’ out-of-state donations compared to the other candidates, I decided to take a deeper dive into her campaign finances. The results were legitimately astounding.

All told, Williams’ C5 report stretches 92 pages in length, and it reads like a who’s who of American wealth and privilege. For every in-state donor, count four more from Hollywood, Silicon Valley, academia, and the Washington-New York political corridor.

Here are just some of the notables, keeping in mind that $710 is the maximum contribution amount allowed under Montana law:

  • Ben Affleck, actor/director, Santa Monica, CA ($710 primary, $710 general)
  • Larry David, Seinfeld co-creator, Los Angeles, CA ($200 primary)
  • Eric Schmidt, former Google CEO, Mountain View, CA ($710 primary, $710 general)
  • Wendy Schmidt, Schmidt Family Foundation President, Palo Alto, CA ($710 primary, $710 general)

Two quick notes on the above:

  1. Wikileaks exposed a close relationship between Schmidt (while Google CEO) and the Clintons, beginning around Hillary’s failed presidential bid in 2008. Williams worked for Mrs. Clinton as the first lady’s Trips Director, and then later on her 2008 campaign.
  2. Whitney Williams obnoxiously took issue with Greg Gianforte for inviting Donald Trump, Jr. to a fundraiser:
https://www.facebook.com/WhitneyforMontana/posts/157066832363174

According to Forbes, Eric Schmidt is the 33rd richest person in the world, with a net worth of more than $16 billion. Williams can bluster all she wants, in vile nativist fashion, about out-of-state influence in this election, but according to her, it’s perfectly OK for a Silicon Valley mega-billionaire like Schmidt — who is worth many times more than all of the Trumps combined — to directly influence who governs Montana, because, well, he supports Williams.

Beyond these headliners, seemingly every pillar of American wealth and privilege has donated to Williams.

Big Tech certainly has:

  • Steven Slupski, security manager (Amazon), Kirkland, WA ($100 primary)
  • David Zapolski, attorney (Amazon), Seattle, WA ($710 primary, $710 general)
  • Thomas Reardon, scientist (Facebook), New York, NY ($710 primary)
  • Dustin Knievel, lead talent partner (GitHub), Seattle, WA ($250 primary)
  • Alexandra Eital, manager (Google), Los Angeles, CA ($710 primary, $290 general)
  • Jacquelline Fuller, technology (Google), Orinda, CA ($710 primary, $710 general)
  • Hector Mujica, program manager (Google), Oakland, CA ($50 primary)
  • Ileana Ovale, technology (Google), San Diego, CA ($100 primary)
  • Polly Zuber, marketing (Google), Santa Monica, CA ($125 primary)
  • Thomas Clark, program manager (Microsoft), Seattle, WA ($250 primary)
  • Adam Zukor, communications (Microsoft), Seattle, WA ($250 primary)

Williams’ filing goes on and on like this.

Scores of other donations come from other entertainment grandees, UC-Berkeley faculty members, “woke” capitalist execs (Nike), along with countless CEOs, attorneys, and elites from tony San Francisco, Seattle, New York, Washington, et al.

You can see it all for yourself here (spoiler alert: you won’t see a whole lot from “Joe Six Pack” working a 9-5 in Silver Bow County):

WilliamsC5


Supporters of Williams will likely point to her experience and connections as a positive in all of this. They might even suggest that Williams (and only Wililams) could persuade a big fish to come to the Treasure State. The truth, however, is that her campaign finances just aren’t normal (and not in a good way). It all smacks of entitlement, and of an effort to solidify yet another political dynasty — one with, frankly, a relatively limited actual connection to Montana. (How much of her life has Williams spent in Montana? Was she even born here?)

Partisanship aside, and no matter what one might think about Mike Cooney or Greg Gianforte or anyone else, every candidate in this race but Williams has raised roughly 80% of their donations (if not more) from actual Montanans. Williams’ efforts to buy herself the governorship on the backs of wealthy coastal elites is next to unbelievable, and as far as I can tell, unprecedented in Montana political history.

Ed Buttrey Gets A Primary

Legislator Ed Buttrey, the incumbent in HD 21, will once again face a competitive primary.

Black Eagle resident Sally Tucker filed to run in HD 21 as a Republican today.

Buttrey trounced Republicans John Abarr and Rickey Linafelter (winning over 75% of the vote) in a three-way primary in 2018, before ultimately defeating Democrat Leesha Ford in the general election, 53-46.

You can view Tucker’s C1 here:

SallyTuckerC1

Nearly 76% Of Whitney Williams’ Donations From Out Of State

Montana Democrat and gubernatorial candidate Whitney Williams is a fundraising tour de force.

Williams, the daughter of former U.S. Representative Pat Williams and former Montana Senate Majority Leader Carol Williams, has amassed a campaign war chest that leads the Democratic field.

According to the Montana Free Press, Williams has raked in $431,768, but with only 24.2% of that total coming from Montana donors. (Mike Cooney comes in second among Democrats, at $399,375, with Casey Schreiner following with just over $80,000.)

Don Pogreba of The Montana Post expanded on the Montana Free Press’ reporting and created a chart detailing, among other things, the percentage of funds raised by each candidate from in-state donors.

Here is the breakdown, in descending order:

  • Al Olszewski (R): 96.2%
  • Reilly Neill (D): 90.0%
  • Casey Schreiner (D): 84.9%
  • Tim Fox (R): 84.3%
  • Greg Gianforte (R): 79.7%
  • Mike Cooney (D): 78.7%
  • Whitney Williams (D): 24.2%

While some might chafe at Williams’ extreme reliance on outside money to influence our governor’s race, rest assured that Williams does not actually want out-of-staters telling us how to vote:

https://www.facebook.com/WhitneyforMontana/posts/157066832363174


See?

If an out-of-stater comes here to “tell” us how to vote, that’s bad. But if an out-of-stater wants to write her a check, that’s good.

Vaughn Volunteer Fire Dept. Fundraiser


_______________________________________________________________________

Editors note: E-City Beat is happy to post your public event announcements. This one sounds delicious and fun!

“Hello everyone! Would you please add our event to your event calendars and possibly do a few shout outs to help get the word out for our fundraiser? Please see attachment for info. Your consideration is greatly appreciated. Hope to see everyone there.”

Jason McAllister
Fire Chief
Vaughn Volunteer Fire Department
(406)403-8774
mtfirerescue1@aol.com

________________________________________________________________________

 

Cost Of Rent In Montana And Innovative Housing Alternatives

_______________________________________________________________________

Here’s an interesting item recently sent to me by a friend – according to ‘Business Insider’, a Montana household needs to earn $49,360 per year in order to comfortably afford rent.

The estimate is based on a study done by GoBankingRates which “…revealed how big your annual salary needs to be to afford rent in every US state, including Washington, DC. To determine the list, they used the budgeting rule of thumb that one should spend no more than 30% of their annual income on housing.”

Here are the numbers for Big Sky Country, which comes in at #32:

Annual income needed: $49,360

Monthly income needed: $4,113

Median rent: $1,234

#1 Washington D.C., has the highest cost:

Annual income needed: $108,440

Monthly income needed: $9,037

Median rent: $2,711

Looking at these numbers made me think that if there’s a study measuring the frequency and severity of windy, blustery days in every state, Great Falls and Cut Bank would push Montana’s average up considerably. I’ll bet Bozeman does the same when it comes to housing costs averaged statewide.

Nevertheless, the struggle is real for renters here and nationwide. Hopefully we will continue to see more rising incomes to offset the housing costs.

Or perhaps even more promising is the trend towards innovative housing alternatives like tiny homes or small, cost effective domiciles made from shipping containers.

Stay tuned for more on the innovative affordable housing front.

________________________________________________________________________

 

Don’t Care Much About Historeee

_______________________________________________________________________

It seems as though we are being assaulted on all sides by those who don’t give two hoots about history, or haven’t a clue about why it is important to our culture. People who should know better either want to change it, destroy it, or ignore it.

First, we read in the Great Falls Tribune that Columbus Day will likely be relegated to the trash-bin of history where it will take its place along with confederate heroes from the Civil War and the historic structures of Palmyra that ISIS militants have decided through some misguided logic are offensive to Mohammad.

Montana House Bill 219 sponsored by Rep. Shane Morigeau was passed by the House of Representatives yesterday and now moves on to the Montana Senate. Does history even care that Rep. Morigeau “dreads the coming each year of Columbus Day”? Does he even know what it represents? I think not.

What seems to matter most to Rep. Morigeau is that he thinks the holiday celebrates an event occurring over 500 years ago where a single man mistreated some indigenous people while laying claim to the New World for his Spanish benefactors. Yes, Columbus was charged with finding riches and returning them to Spain, but his accomplishment goes far beyond the small amount of gold he secured for the Spanish crown.

Probably Rep. Morigeau hasn’t a clue about the history of Columbus Day and why it was established as a national holiday, but count him in as a card-carrying member of the PC police and history be damned.

If Rep. Morigeau and others would like to take Montana in the direction of other states like Hawaii, Oregon and South Dakota, in the elimination of Columbus Day he should be aware of a couple of important facts. First, Columbus never set one foot in what we now call America.

Secondly, history is replete with examples of indigenous peoples in America conquering and taking neighboring tribes as slaves, stealing their land, brutalizing and raping women, engaging in human sacrifice and torture as well as committing atrocities including acts of cannibalism. All of this before any Europeans even knew the New World existed. To my knowledge, Columbus never dined on another human being.

The Tribune also reported another history related story, “A Bit Cold, But Signed Sealed And Delivered”. “Final beams of Great Falls High School Hub addition put in place. I guess we have completely forgotten the utter destruction of the historic campus on which the hub addition was predicated. A forest of mature ash trees destroyed, the south campus defaced and asphalt replacing the lush green campus to make room for a parking plan that was criticized by the Montana State Historic Preservation Office.

Of course we would expect Superintendent Tammy Lacey’s picture to accompany the article because it’s all about her, but what about school board trustee Jeff Gray whose picture of him signing the “topping out” beam at Great Falls High School was prominently displayed in the Tribune article reporting the event?

Trustee Gray demonstrated his dislike for history by voting not to support the well-deserved nomination of the Great Falls High School campus as a historic site on the National Register of Historic Places.

In spite of Jeff Gray’s attempt to scuttle the nomination, it passed, but has been severely eroded by the poorly designed Hub addition and lack of professional planning for the campus. In the end, trustee Gray has been part of a successful attempt to destroy an important part of local history.

Another part of local history that is being compromised is the University of Providence, formerly known as the University of Great Falls, and before that, the College of Great Falls, and before that, the Great Falls Commercial College. The president, and UP board of trustees have elected to eliminate a number of programs valued as core elements of the previously fine liberal arts institution.

Gone will be Accounting, Art, Elementary Education, Secondary Education, English, HISTORY, Sociology, Theater and Business Arts, and Theology. I know, a Catholic university eliminating Theology, right? You guessed it, it’s all about the money, but if UP wanted the best of both worlds, tuition revenues and maintaining a dedication to a liberal arts education, they would seriously consider establishing a UP law school. A law school benefits from a well-rounded liberal arts education, and I believe a UP law school would be very successful in attracting students from Montana and many other parts of the Northwest. After all, The Sisters of Providence list as their Core Values: Compassion, Dignity, Justice, Excellence, and Integrity.

Maybe these three examples of the destruction of history is all the more reason to teach it.

________________________________________________________________________