Brother, Can You Spare ANOTHER Dime?

MONEY

“Why is it that the further away you get from kids, the more money you make?”

Spencer Campbell spends much of his days walking the halls of Elk Ridge Middle School, checking breezeways for kids playing hooky, redirecting foot traffic between classes and checking on substitute teachers.

Campbell is one of two assistant principals at Elk Ridge, a school just south of Salt Lake City, Utah. 

Before coming to education, Campbell owned a small business. He says he felt drawn to schools, though, so he got a master’s degree and spent five years in the classroom as a teacher.

“The effect that a classroom teacher has on a student is second only to a parent,” Campbell says  . “

Campbell reports that it was very hard to support his family making $43,000 as a teacher, so he became an administrator and doubled his salary.

Campbell says. “And as an administrator, I don’t know if I’ll ever be able to have that same effect and that’s kind of heartbreaking.”

https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2017/06/01/530887882/increasing-salaries-so-teachers-dont-have-to-become-principals

Are we losing great teachers to administrative positions? Probably. Should we cut administrator’s salaries in order to raise teacher’s salaries and keep them in the classrooms? Probably.

Below you will find the District provided list of Administrative positions and corresponding salaries totaling $4,593,558.00, including days contracted. From the total amount the District notes that $326,319.00 is not paid from the General Fund.

Using a multiplier of approximately 1.5, that brings the effective cost of administrative salaries to over $6,000,000!

“As of June 30, 2017 Montana’s Governor’s salary was $108,167 – GFPS Superintendent Tammy Lacey’s salary is $150,000.

The State of Montana’s Superintendent of Public Instruction earned a salary of $104,635 – GFPS Assistant Ruth Ueker’s salary is $122,020.”

As of June 30, 2017 Montana’s Governor’s salary was $108,167 – GFPS Superintendent Tammy Lacey’s salary is $150,000. The State of Montana’s Superintendent of Public Instruction earned a salary of $104,635 – GFPS Assistant Ruth Ueker’s salary is $122,020.

Should we be asking – “Brother can you Spare ANOTHER Dime?”

You can view, download and share a PDF copy of this entire GFPS administrative salaries list here. Why not print off copies to hand out and email to all of your friends, family, and neighbors?

Where’s The Beef – Madison Food Park?

I moved to southwest Kansas in the early nineteen-seventies as that area (Garden City, Dodge City and Liberal) experienced an economic boom based on the growth and influx of cattle feed lots, slaughter-houses and beef transport facilities.  Like present day Montana, Finney, Ford and Seward, Kansas counties had just one major export….their young people, most of them leaving for better employment opportunities elsewhere. 

Long past were the tourism days of Boot Hill and Dodge City’s famous Front Street and, even the then modern businesses surrounding what were once considered enhanced agricultural-production techniques including over-fertilization, extreme irrigation, and pesticide abuse, had begun to fade, mostly because of the then-already-depleted Ogallala Aquifer and the already increasing electricity costs required to operate the irrigation pumps then in use.

Like Great Falls today, southwestern Kansas was experiencing no-growth stagnancy with regard to population and business.  While all of this was going on big cities around the country….Chicago, Omaha, Des Moines, Dallas and Fort Worth, to name a few, were limiting or taxing out of business their major meat packing companies.  The three southwest Kansas communities just mentioned offered tax incentives and abatements to encourage those big packers to move to that area.  With them came what once was considered “minority” population growth.  Dodge City went from approximately 2% Hispanic population to more than 50%, and even though many quality Mexicans moved there, even more left Mexico, illegally immigrating into the United States, imagining to have left their legal and social problems behind.  Dodge City, Garden City and Liberal, for the most part, didn’t receive or welcome what proved not-to-be-Mexico’s-finest.

We gained at least part of our population from illegal immigrants who were ex-convicts, mental patients, scofflaws and outlaws.  Dodge City’s Naturalization and immigration Service was years behind managing the amazing influx of, not just Hispanics but Cuban Boat People, Laotians and Vietnamese, all of them moving to Dodge, Garden and Liberal to work at what were then considered “high-paying” jobs.  Tent cities sprung up all over that part of the country; make-shift trailer parks built of previously abandoned and ancient mobile homes began to grow around the packing houses and feedlots, their room partitions removed so a greater number of people could sleep on their floors.  Criminal activity abounded everywhere.

“Integral to the declining life-style of that day’s southwest Kansas population was the extreme filth and foul odor that permeated every part of our community.  At that time, approximately 25,000 head were slaughtered daily in Dodge City’s then 3 major slaughter-houses.”

Integral to the declining life-style of that day’s southwest Kansas population was the extreme filth and foul odor that permeated every part of our community.  At that time, approximately 25,000 head were slaughtered daily in Dodge City’s then 3 major slaughter-houses.  These 25,000 head were also transported in huge semi-tractor-trailers through our town every day of the week, upon most of our major streets and highways, each of them slopping tons and tons of liquefied manure onto everything they passed, especially as they turned corners, slowed down, stopped, or regained movement.  Crossing South Second Avenue, where I worked, required overshoes twelve months of the year, if you didn’t want your boots, dress clothes or shoes redecorated.  Flies were everywhere and the stench of rotting manure and cooking blood permeated the entire area.  Huge centrifuges separated the blood from water, turning the blood into meal.  In the morning, everything in town was covered with a ruddy-colored dust.

A major problem then as well as now is the provision of adequate water supply to constantly bathe the kill floors of these packing houses to remove manure, hay, straw, dirt and filth that enter with the cattle.  The Ogallala Aquifer, once the life-blood of Southwest Kansas, began to decline, its level lowering so drastically that towns and population bases on the outside of the aquifer no longer had adequate water supplies.  Car washes, laundromats and, in some cases, underground lawn sprinklers or farm field irrigation could no longer be utilized.  And the Arkansas River, once a major tributary of the Mississippi as it flowed eastward from Colorado through Kansas on its way to Oklahoma and Arkansas, began to dry up.  The once stately Cottonwood trees that lined both sides of the river between Garden City and Dodge City and beyond, began to die out until, now, there’s no evidence that either river or trees were once predominate.  Water, still the lifeblood of those Southwestern Kansas communities, became a hugely marketable and profitable resource.

Throughout Southwestern Kansas are hundreds of feed-lots containing millions of cows, each of them fattened for their final trip to an area slaughter-house.  For 25 miles in every direction of each of these three Southwestern Kansas communities, the overwhelming stench of decaying, fermenting manure fills the air.  Roads and highways, worn beyond county and state ability to maintain them, are rough, dusty and manure-packed.  Cattle, like us, also have a natural mortality rate, probably aggravated by the rough treatment they receive during shipping and handling.  Many of them die before they make it to the slaughterhouse.  All over that part of our country are stacks of dead, bloated cattle carcasses, their legs sticking straight into the air, advertising their condition as they wait for National Bi-Products or some such other rendering or pet-food company to pick them up.  The smell of death is everywhere. 

In some ways our local economy was enhanced.  Hispanics, Vietnamese and Cuban Boat people drove cars and pickups like the rest of us.  Small used car lots began to appear everywhere and the largest new car dealers grew even larger, or so it seemed, although most of their growth was due to the demise of dealers less successful.  Buy-Here/Pay-Here lots were the main financing method so repossession companies also appeared out of no-where.  Title-pawn companies also began to appear, many of them dishonest.  Some of the  more successful immigrants got into service businesses…if your business used red rags, area rugs or rolled cloth towel machines, for instance, you began to trade with the people who distributed them, or if you hired custodial workers or low-income laborers, there were more-than-enough people to fill this need.  Hispanic and Vietnamese grocery stores began to abound as authentic Mexican food restaurants took over every abandoned filling station and barber shop. 

I owned a small car lot in Dodge City, similar to what I have today.  I’d be lying if I said I didn’t experience growth in business based on my Hispanic and Vietnamese trade, but there was a cost that came with it.  If I didn’t patronize their service businesses, I began to experience retaliatory vandalism and theft, and, if I didn’t go along with “the man” who delivered his “friends”, “co-workers”, and “relatives”, to me, I was eliminated from their “trade”.  I used to enjoy the most handsome, well-dressed Hispanic man I ever met, a man who repeatedly brought his friends, co-workers and relatives to my business.  Neither the Hispanics, nor the Vietnamese trusted American banks and bankers, so they generally appointed the most powerful and influential person, usually a man, from their group to act as their “banker.”  Since hardly any of these people spoke English, it was important to have a translator who could help us arrange business transactions.

Julian Medranio had been a carnival worker in Mexico, then became a prison guard and just before leaving Mexico became a policeman.  He was probably the most corrupt man I ever met in person.  He’d show up in a shiny black Cadillac purchased somewhere else, two or three white, blond prostitutes in the back seat, and the customer of the day up front.  Waving a fistful of cash, he’d tell that customer what vehicle he’d be driving home and, if the customer in any way resisted, he was beat to the ground in front of me, Julian careful not to scuff his $1100-a-pair Guccis or smudge his Cartier sunglasses. 

Julian’s main business was false identification.  At that time Dodge City was gaining 1,000 new Mexicans a month, most of them illegal aliens and unemployable for more than one reason.  Julian kept a Rolodex of illegal identification cards, Green cards, driver’s licenses and Social Security cards.  His business was selling these necessary to employment tools.  To get away with this he “played ball” with local law enforcement, turning in those who refused or who were, otherwise unable, to pay for new, necessary identification.

One time when I wholesaled a Chevy pickup to another used vehicle dealer in Dodge and was asked to leave the keys in the ignition so an employee of that business could pick it up, the vehicle was, instead, stolen….by an non-naturalized Mexican.  Law enforcement in Dodge had by that time already become a lot like law enforcement in many other areas…..they’d learned that their pay checks still cashed whether or not they subjected themselves and their families to danger, so did very little to assist property crimes.  The “man” to call was Julian Medrano.  I called him; he found my pickup, camouflaged in cardboard and cut tree limbs, in less than three hours.  He turned the non-naturalized Hispanic over to the Dodge City Police who turned him over to Naturalization and Immigration, who deported him back to Mexico.  Julian claimed the man’s attractive young Mexican wife, prostituted her, and took their two small children to be sold to those who’d pay for them.

Julian was constantly working on the fringes of the law and was constantly threatened with expulsion from our country.  One time, when deportation was imminent, I asked him what he was going to do.  Pulling out his Rolodex of illegal identification cards, he said, “I’ll be a new Mexican tomorrow!” 

My family lived on LaVista Avenue, across the street from one of Dodge City’s most prestigious areas.  We had apple and pear trees in our yard and enjoyed the fruit they produced, that is, until the Hispanic and Vietnamese population began to overtake us and, more than once, while were at church, our trees were stripped bare.  We enjoyed our church family at Our Lady of Guadalupe Church although we never did learn to understand all of the Spanish Mass as we steadily became “the minority.”

My wife, employed by the Dodge City School District, was the head of the local bilingual Program.  Because of problems within our school district, many of them caused by the multi-cultures we tried to integrate, we put our kids into safe, private schools.  Right before leaving Dodge City, one of my wife’s fourth grade students was murdered near the school where she taught at Wilroads Gardens.  We moved to Great Falls to escape all of this, to what we imagined would be a better life.  With the Madison Food Park it looks like our lives are starting over again. 

Eggselent Observations And Questions

Editor’s note: The following is a piece from one of our readers who is a local consumer, Jo Russell. We thought it was pretty interesting and hope you do too.

Just curious if anyone knows why…

Last week, a friend told me that the eggs she preferred to buy at a local supermarket had increased in cost to almost $6.00 for a carton of 18 eggs. The store clerk she talked to apologized for the high price but did not know why the increase had occurred.

I visited the East End Walmart and the Super 1 stores and found that indeed, a carton of 18 AA Large eggs from our local Montana Eggs, LLC, was priced at $5.48. These eggs were not labeled as organic or cage free, etc. The store brand eggs at the two stores, same number, same size, from a company distribution center out of state were priced at $1.88 and $2.18.

“We are just wondering why a business that was given some generous breaks to build and market here in Great Falls charges almost 3 times as much for eggs.”

And here’s a recent update to Jo’s original observations:

I know this is not headline news around town but my friends and I became more interested as we looked into it. Three different grocery store employees could not explain the price differences, but they didn’t tell us they can charge whatever price they wish for their merchandise or dismiss us as old and not very smart.

We all understand  that Great Falls shoppers have the freedom to purchase  the size and “quality” of eggs they wish. We were just a bit confused when we noticed all  the price differences between the “local” Montana Eggs, LLC business and the eggs shipped into town under grocers’ labels.

The Montana Egg cartons I have seen at Walmart, Albertson’s, and Smith’s advertise that their eggs are “United Egg Producers Certified.”  Does this imply that a higher price is justified?

I visited some stores today to recheck some prices. Sam’s Club offered 5 DOZEN AA Large Montana Eggs in cartons and packaged,  for “around $12.00”,  according to a customer who posted on April 9.

Walmart offered their own brand of Great Value AA  18-count Large eggs for $2.33.  Their MONTANA EGGS 18-count Large eggs costs $5.48.

Smith’s offered their Kroger brand 18-count AA Large eggs at $2.38.

The MONTANA EGGS 18-count AA Large eggs are $6.59.

PLUS:  Smith’s had stickers near the eggs, stating these were “CUSTOMER REQUESTED ITEM.”

Albertson’s displayed their Lucerne store brand 18-count AA Large eggs at $2.39.  The MONTANA EGGS 18-count Large eggs cost $6.59.

Super 1 store brand Western Family 18-count AA Large eggs cost $2.28.  There were NO MONTANA EGG 18-count cartons on display when I visited today.

Jo Russell

Too Many Generals, Not Enough Soldiers?

Did you know that the number of administrators employed by the Great Falls Public School District is now one more than it was at this time last year? The number of administrators, which includes school principals, has gone from 42 to 43 with a reported salary cost of $4.2 million.

This was confirmed by GFPS Superintendent Tammy Lacey in an email to a citizen dated January 16, 2018:

“I confirm that the number of administrators increased by one but contend that the quantity of work and more importantly, the quality of the work…are worth adding to the administrative footprint.” – Tammy Lacey, January 16, 2018

“I confirm that the number of administrators increased by one…”

If you figure in the standard multiplying factor of 1.5 used by most employers to calculate the actual cost of employees that comes out to around $6.3 million.

Maybe it’s time to consider whether the GFPS has too many high-paid generals and not enough boots on the ground. It appears they are not hearing our message to cut back on administration costs.

Maybe the taxpayers need to send that message a lot more loudly and a lot more clearly this May 8th when it comes time to vote on the school tax increase.

Do School Levies Ever Expire? (Hint: No)

The Great Falls Public School District is currently running a campaign to promote another school tax increase and they’re paying for it, in part, with our tax money. One of their favorite slogans is “Facts Matter” yet the fact that our tax dollars are being used to convince us to give them even more of our tax dollars is a fact that they never seem to mention.

But we agree – facts do indeed matter. That is why E-City Beat will be posting brief facts about our school district and it’s funding on a regular basis starting with the following:

Do school levies ever expire?

The short answer is ‘No’. Levies are different from bonds which do expire after the voted upon time period – usually 20 years. Levies become part of the permanent funding that school districts rely on in order to build their budgets each year.

Here is a description of the difference between the two:

Bonds and levies are two different ways for a municipality to raise revenue. A bond is debt, offered to the public, which must eventually be repaid with interest. By contrast, a levy is a tax that  towns and counties impose on local property owners in order to raise money for services.

“The bottom line is that we are all still paying taxes on the levies that were voted upon in the 60’s, 70’s, 80’s and every year since that a levy passed. That also means that we are obligating future generations forever to the tax increases that may pass on May 8th this year.”

The bottom line is that we are all still paying taxes on the levies that were voted upon in the 60’s, 70’s, 80’s and every year since that a levy passed. That also means that we are obligating future generations forever to the tax increases that may pass on May 8th this year.

Vote wisely Great Falls.

Great Falls High School Chronicle – Part 5

Need To Expand, The Ideas, The Money, The GFHS Legacy. Is The School District’s Proposal The Best Solution? 

NOTABLE EVENT 2017:  Great Falls High School’s historic original building was recognized in 2017 by Architectural Digest Magazine as one of the Most Beautiful Public High Schools in America. 

During 2012 the Great Falls High School Heritage Foundation (GFHS-HF), an independent nonprofit organization founded by Darrell A. Swanson (GFHS 1965) and Phillip M. Faccenda (GFHS 1965) initiated the historic window replacement program and coordinated efforts with the District for a demonstration project.  To replace the Kalwall windows, GFHS-HF selected, recommended, and gained approval for the appropriate historic replacement windows, provided engineering models and comparative values, established compliance with the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC), prepared bid documents, and through donations successfully funded the first six windows of the program.  It continues with GFHS-HF and the Great Falls Public Schools Foundation.

NEW TOWER WINDOWS-GREAT FALLS HERITAGE
FOUNDATION 2016 ARCHIVE PHOTO

New Library Windows-Great Falls High School Heritage Foundation 2017 Archive Photo

New Library Windows-Great Falls High School Heritage Foundation 2015 Archive Photo

 

GFPS PROPOSAL NUMBER ONE

The District intends to expand the GFHS campus because, as many times before, the available spaces do not have the capacity to provide the education services needed.  So another development process began approximately eight years ago.

In February 2010, Dr. Cheryl K. Crawley, Great Falls Public Schools Superintendent, established a task force to study the physical plant at GFHS. The task force’s charge was to recommend improvements and changes to the buildings, grounds, and physical plant of the high school so that the school can continue to provide a high-quality education while remaining at near-capacity in terms of enrollment. Dr. Crawley’s report noted that GFHS currently has dining facilities too small for the size of the student body; requires students, faculty, staff, and the public to unsafely walk outdoors during winter weather to move between buildings, lacks an adequate HVAC system (particularly in moving fresh air into the interior as well as moving air around inside the building), cannot accommodate high-bandwidth computer or phone lines, and has poor cell phone, television, and radio reception.

Because of the need for those upgrades, GFPS started the process to master plan the expansion of the facilities.  Local Architect, L’Heureux Page Warner, was hired for a fee of $150,000 to assist with space programming and to study master planning the campus.  LPW’s $59M proposal showed a two-story bridge connecting the 2nd and 3rd floors of the main campus to the south campus, removing the existing Industrial Arts building, adding parking to Kranz Park and the practice field, and adding new parking at the corner of 2nd Avenue and 20th Street.  There was community opposition to this plan by citizens and alumni of the school.  Mainly because of high cost and the proposed design direction. Letters to the Editor were written and a large billboard against the initial concept appeared. The first master plan proposal was ultimately rejected by the school district.

GFPS PROPOSAL NUMBER ONE—–IMAGE FROM GFPS WEB SITE

GFPS PROPOSAL NUMBER ONE—–IMAGE FROM GFPS WEB SITE

GFPS PROPOSAL NUMBER TWO

The Great Falls Public Schools Superintendent changed to Tammy Lacey and the process continued.  Hulteng CCM, Inc., headquartered in Billings, MT, was selected to manage the $98M school district wide development project.  The school district conceptualized a second GFHS maste rplan proposal and included it in the bond request to the tax payers.  There was again certain community opposition to this plan.  Mainly because of high cost, concern about the three-story connection to the historic structure, parking scattered on the campus, and centralized outdoor storage.  Letters to the Editor were written and many opinions of opposition appeared on blog sites.

GFPS proposal NUMBER TWO-Image from GFPS Web site

GFPS PROPOSAL NUMBER TWO-IMAGE FROM GFPS WEB SITE

GFPS PROPOSAL NUMBER THREE

During 2017 the district was successful in bonding $38M to upgrade GFHS Main Campus Classrooms, Parking, Technology Career & Technical Education (CTE) Facilities, Lunch/Dining Areas, Building Entrances and STEM Classrooms. Also, during 2017, the district selected a team of consultants to carry forward with master planning and design.  The team is headed by NE45 Architects of Bozeman, MT, and Bassetti Architects of Seattle, WA.  Local engineering companies support the group.  Cost for design services was not disclosed.

The above noted second master plan proposal was discarded by the school district.  As a result, GFPS has proposed a third architectural proposal that, in many ways, is not unlike the proposals before.  It would place parking on many locations on campus and Kranz Park and have fenced outdoor storage yards, shops, service roads, and delivery trucks centrally located between the existing IA building and Field House.  It would also have one story of new space connecting the Field House to the historic original Main Campus building, thereby eliminating the east/west pedestrian flow through the campus along the Fourth Avenue South corridor.

The following explains the GFPS proposal NUMBER THREE.  It was presented to the Community at GFHS on January 25, 2018.  The district is currently asking for public comment about their proposal.

GFPS proposal NUMBER THREE-Image from GFPS Web site

The District’s third architectural proposal would eliminate the east/west pedestrian flow through the campus along the Fourth Avenue South corridor with new ground floor space between the field house and the original building. 

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT’S PROPOSED NEW SPACE BETWEEN THE FIELD HOUSE AND ORIGINAL BUILDING
—VIEW LOOKING WEST FROM 4TH AVE SOUTH AND 20TH STREET—
GFPS proposal NUMBER THREE-Image from GFPS Web site

—THE SCHOOL DISTRICT’S PROPOSED INTRUSIVE WALL THAT WOULD BECOME A BARRIER—
—VIEW LOOKING EAST FROM 4TH AVE SOUTH AND 18TH STREET—
GFPS proposal NUMBER THREE-Image from GFPS Web site

The design and approval process are ongoing but nearing an end for this third proposal.  The public can review it and make comments at following links:

https://gfps.k12.mt.us/great-falls-high-school-addition-and-renovation/

https://vimeo.com/252550527

https://gfps.k12.mt.us/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/GFHS%20Slide%20Show%20Community%20Mtg%20%281%29.pdf

The conclusion of this process is the next phase of the history and legacy at GFHS. 

Should THE SCHOOL DISTRICT’S PROPOSAL BE THE FINAL SOLUTION?????

YOUR COMMENTS SHOULD BE HEARD HERE AND AT THE DISTRICT.

 By Darrell A. Swanson-GFHS Class of 1965, Architect/Planner, Tax Payer, and Citizen

Candidate Profile: Brian Hoven (R) Senate District 13

Editor’s note: This is our continuing series of profiles for local legislative candidates. Each state House and Senate candidate in the Great Falls area was given the opportunity to submit, in their own words, a brief profile outlining why they’re running, what party they represent and why they are the best candidate for the position. You can see the full list of local candidates here.

Democrat Bob Moretti and Libertarian Kevin Leatherbarrow are the other candidates in Senate District 13 and they did not respond to our request for a profile. 

State Senator Brian Hoven

Why are you running for the office?

I want to make a meaningful contribution to benefit present and future generations of Montanans. As a native of Great Falls and local business owner for 40 years, I’m confident I can successfully represent the priorities and values of Senate District 13 and Montana. I care about our citizens and their families and want to provide the opportunities to improve their lives.

Why are you running as a Republican?

I believe everyone prospers with a growing economy and thriving business community. With 55 years of business experience, I’ve learned that lowering taxes, eliminating excessive regulation and stopping frivolous litigation promotes business growth and job creation. On the hand, I realize that smart government, fair taxes and sensible regulations are necessary for public services, safety nets for the less fortunate, and equal opportunity for all our citizens. My job as a legislator is to find the right balance, and that requires and open mind.

What makes you the best candidate in the race?

There’s no substitute for experience, both private and public sector, and my resume speaks for itself:

1. Graduate of Princeton University, B.A. Science and Engineering

2. Manufacturing manager for Proctor and Gamble, 1963 to 1977

3. Founded Hoven Equipment, a farm equipment dealership, with wife Barbara in Great Falls in 1978. Today, Hoven Equipment provides 28 people with good jobs and benefits.

4. Elected to House District 24 in 2008, re-elected in 2010 and 2012; elected to Senate District 13 in 2014

5. Served on the Taxation Committee and Agriculture Committee for five legislative sessions

While serving in the Montana Legislature, I’ve supported free enterprise, disciplined budgets, education funding, access to public lands, responsible natural resource development, and Medicaid expansion with co-pays and job skills inventories. Equally important, I’ve supported help for the elderly and opportunities for people with disabilities. If re-elected I’ll do more of the same.

The Whole Truth

Are we getting the whole truth about the $13.9 million in new levies that the Great Falls Public School District ($1.348 million) and the City of Great Falls ($12.6 million) wants us to approve? And if we, the taxpayers, don’t approve them will that cause the dire consequences listed in their distributed promotional materials?

Okay Chicken Littles, let’s take a look.

First, the taxpayers of this city just got done giving the school district nearly a tenth of billion dollars only 18 months ago. Yes, that’s right, a tenth of a BILLION dollars! Oh right, that money can only go to building and repair projects, and this year’s request of $1.348 million is for operational costs. So what? It matters far less to taxpayers which District accounts the money goes into than which accounts it comes out of: OURS! All of it.

“Oh right, that money can only go to building and repair projects, and this year’s request of $1.348 million is for operational costs. So what? It matters far less to taxpayers which District accounts the money goes into than which accounts it comes out of: OURS! All of it.”

Many of our neighbors and families live on fixed incomes, not like the school district and the City, and just can’t afford higher taxes. We have all heard about elderly people cutting back on their medical prescriptions because they can’t afford the never-ending taxes and costs of living increases that are forced upon them.

The school district treats taxpayers like a checking account with overdraft protection.

And, is the school district really cutting back on expenses? In a January 16, 2018 Email from Superintendent Tammy Lacey she said this:

“I confirm that the number of administrators increased by one, but contended that quantity of work and more importantly, the quality of the work (given Shelly’s and Susan’s previous experiences) are worth adding to the administrative footprint. As I have said, every time an administrator leaves our organization, it is a good to re-evaluate. Sometimes the re-evaluation reduces the footprint and as in this case, sometimes it increases it. The Bottom line for either outcome is what is best for student outcomes.”

Oh really?

The enrollment trend has been down, not UP for the Great Falls School District over the last 20 plus years from well over 12,000 students to just over 10,000 students. Should it also mean a reduction in personnel? You would think so because if it was the other way around the District would have cried that they needed more staff.

The enrollment for the school year 2007-2008 was 10,985, this year it is 10,449, a decrease of over 500 students in the past 10 years. Enrollment was down about 100 students last year alone.

To add insult to injury, the huge majority of the proposed $1.348 million levy goes to “Contractual Obligations”, added health insurance premiums and raises, and that includes administrators making six figures.

Are we living in the Twilight Zone, or what? Just tell us the Truth, we can handle it and vote accordingly. We know who needs a “footprint”, and where!

Please take our poll on the upcoming GFPS tax increase.

[poll id=”11″]

Candidate Profile: Steven Galloway (R) Senate District 12

Editor’s note: This is the first in our series of profiles for local legislative candidates. Each state House and Senate candidate in the Great Falls area was given the opportunity to submit, in their own words, a brief profile outlining why they’re running, what party they represent and why they are the best candidate for the position. You can see the full list of local candidates here.

Democrat Carlie Boland is the other candidate in Senate District 12 and she did not respond to our request for a profile. 

1.Why am I running for office?                                                                                  First and foremost to bring COMMON SENSE SOLUTIONS to the issues faced by our state! I have been blessed to have been married almost 37 years to my wonderful wife and raised our six children in Great Falls. We have been blessed by our businesses and I want to give back by serving in Montana’s Senate district #12. Lola Sheldon-Galloway my beautiful wife currently serves as a representative in House District 22. Supporting her in her role in the last session I have been inspired to also participate in our privileged right of self government. Sharing in her experience in the last session has educated me and prepared me in the processes of our legislature. Please do your part as a citizen of the greatest country on Earth and participate by registering and voting in our electoral process!

2.Why am I running as a Republican?
We believe in limited government! We believe that our state’s financial woes are not from lack of taxes but rather from over spending, lack of planning and lack of oversight. We believe in reducing government. Local issues are best addressed by local government! We believe in the Constitution of the United States of America.

3. What makes me the best candidate in this race? First, I am 3rd generation Montanan, hometown boy, born and raised in Great Falls and want to see it be even greater.
I want to apply my business management experience and knowledge from twelve years in construction trades, over thirty years in food service, over thirty years in retail building materials and hardware sales, over 42 years as a landlord and in property management. I know how to balance budgets, cut waste, increase productivity with training and positive reinforcement!

I have served as a boy scout leader, coached kids in many sports, served in our church as a teacher, counselor, executive secretary and auditor.

My sister Susan Galloway was murdered in 1982, that very trying experience taught me how our justice system functions and what empathy is. Our family has had to testify at parole hearings many times to keep her killer out of our society. Our family has missed her so much!

I have learned it is absolutely necessary to look beyond the obvious when passing legislation to understand the cause and effect it will have on current and future generations. My parents instilled in me a relentless work ethic. The world has given me many trials to over come and the Lord has blessed me to understand He can make up the difference, if I give my best! I am always willing to listen and work to have a common prospective on issues.

So my simple mantra is I will bring COMMON SENSE SOLUTIONS.
I encourage you to vote for me.

STEVEN E GALLOWAY
for Senate seat #12

Please share your thoughts, insights and concerns with me at
galloway4mt@gmail.com

Let’s all get involved! We need your help with yard signs, phone calls, mailers, going door to door or even host a social for my campaign!
Thank you for your time!

STEVEN E GALLOWAY

Park Pickpocket

Did you know that the City of Great Falls is spending Great Falls taxpayers money to promote a ballot measure to, wait for it…get more of Great Falls taxpayers money!

The Great Falls Parks and Recreation Department’s yearly Summer Guide, paid for with our tax dollars, came out today in the Tribune and last week at various locations and it was filled with “information” about the new proposed consolidated Park District tax which will be on the ballot this May, including warnings of the dire consequences if voters don’t vote in favor of it and a big, red “VOTE MAY 8, 2018”.

In addition, city staff, paid for by our tax dollars, has been busy with “informational” presentations and flyers and meetings with Mayor Kelly and others. Your city government has been using its resources and moolah, our tax dollars, to promote the Park District plan. And the cost of that plan to taxpayers?:

“The cost of the proposed improvements for the district is $1.5 million annually for the first three years; the assessment method will be based on taxable value; the estimated 2018 assessment for a property with a 2017 Market Value of $100,000 would be $22.92 per year ($1.91/month).  The amount of the assessment can be adjusted annually and must be set by resolution and adopted by the City Commission.” – (emphasis added) https://greatfallsmt.net/recreation/great-falls-park-district-number-1

This expenditure of your money by the city in a campaign to get more of your money is made possible because the City of Great Falls formed an Incidental Political Committee registered with the Montana Office of Political Practices for the purpose of influencing the May election in favor of the Park District levy. The City of Great Falls Incidental Committee lists Melissa Kinzler as Treasurer. Ms. Kinzler is also the Director of Fiscal Services for the City of Great Falls.

It appears that so far the city has spent $6052.78 to promote the Park District plan to get more of our money. Here is a detailed accounting.

This kind of stuff shouldn’t surprise anyone here. Remember last year when the city spent $16,403.35 (not including labor cost) on a full color fancy brochure mail insert promoting the Park District levy which they included with the tax levy protest form! You can’t make this stuff up.

So even though they are not explicitly declaring “VOTE YES FOR THE PARK DISTRICT” in their “informational presentations”, which would not be permitted even under the label of an incidental committee, the City of Great Falls is nevertheless promoting a big new local tax and they are using your tax dollars to do it.

“So even though they are not explicitly declaring “VOTE YES FOR THE PARK DISTRICT” in their “informational presentations”, which would not be permitted even under the label of an incidental committee, the City of Great Falls is nevertheless promoting a big new local tax and they are using your tax dollars to do it.”

Are you okay with that? We’re not.