GF City Commission Swaps Kranz Park Land, Tryon Lone ‘No’ Vote

Editors note: E-City Beat has requested and received permission to copy and paste Great Falls City Commissioner Rick Tryon’s reports from his public commissioner’s Facebook page, ‘Rick Tryon for a Greater Great Falls’.

“At Tuesday’s (1/19/21) City Commission meeting the commission voted 4 – 1 to approve a land swap between the City of Great Falls and the Great Falls Public School District.

I was the lone dissenting vote.

The land swap is briefly described in the agenda packet as follows:

“The District will exchange a 10 acre parcel of land adjacent to the Seibel Soccer Park, referred to as the Loy land, for City property that includes the 6 most easterly lots of Kranz Park. Both properties have been valued to be like kind with equal or greater value of approximately $150,000. The City and the School District accept such valuation and consideration.”

You can find further the details of the proposed swap in the agenda packet here.

The reasons for City staff recommendation to proceed with the exchange are listed in the packet as follow:

1. The GFPS commenced the land swap process with the City in good faith. Staff believes the City should honor the District’s efforts and complete the exchange.

2. There are concerns by residents about parking around Great Falls High School. The swap demonstrates a willingness of the City to assist the school district with addressing the problem, which from time to time, requires City intervention.

3. Even though the City will not immediately use the exchanged property, or even has specific plans for it at this time, staff encourages the Commission to consider future options for the site that are complementary to long range park plans.

a) As the City grows eastwardly, the area is underserved by park and green space.

b) Utilization of the existing soccer complex is considerable. It is easy to recognize need in the future for additional recreation space, practice and/or play fields.

4. The School District has been previously approached by other private parties interested in purchasing this property adjacent to the Great Falls Soccer Complex. If the property was sold and eventually developed, it is unlikely that the City would be able acquire the parcel at a later date for expanded recreational opportunities as described above.

5. As indicated by the District, it does not have discretionary funds, other than the value of the property being swapped, to pay the City directly for the Kranz Park lots and commence parking area improvements.

I didn’t vote against the trade because I oppose 10 additional acres of City park or a parking lot for GFHS. My reasons for opposition to the land swap were these:

1. The commission was not provided with any analysis or estimates as to the cost of maintaining and developing 10 more acres of City park land, which will have to be mowed, weeded, watered, kept clean etc. or where the money would come from to maintain or develop the property.

I think we owe the taxpayers a better explanation as to how and why we’re spending their money.

2. The commission was not proved with a complete, professional appraisal of the taxpayer’s Kranz Park property before the swap was voted on, only a Cadastral card which is not good enough in my enough in my opinion. A professional appraisal was provided to the commission for the District’s property.

3. Neighborhood Council #9, the neighborhood surrounding Kranz Park, did not vote on the land swap as presented at Tuesday’s public hearing. While the NHC vote is not required, we should have heard from the folks in that neighborhood through their NHC before approving the swap.

I didn’t hear any compelling reasons as to why the land swap was an urgent matter. I argued that we should wait and hold the public hearing and vote after we had more time to gather information, 4 – 6 weeks at the most.

I think your City Commission owes you a more deliberative process than was delivered in this case.

You can watch the video of the public hearing and vote here.”

Board of Health Votes to Adopt Revised COVID-19 Control Measures

Editors note – below is the press release from Cascade County sent Wednesday, January 20, 2021 2:40 PM

Great Falls, MT — This morning, the Cascade City-County Board of Health met to vote to adopt less restrictive COVID-19 control measures in light of Governor Gianforte’s recent directives. 

Last week, Governor Greg Gianforte announced that he was rescinding former Governor Bullock’s Executive Orders 2-2020 and 3-2020. Governor Gianforte also issued a new Directive implementing his Executive Order 2-2021, which lifts some restrictions but leaves the mask order in place. 

The directive states that “in the interest of uniformity of laws and to prevent the spread of disease, all inconsistent local government health ordinances or orders are preempted by this Directive, but only to the extent they are less restrictive.” That is, Governor Gianforte’s directive does not supersede local health orders. 

A local Health Officer Order will be issued later today and will be uploaded to the Cascade County COVID-19 webpage (check the documents section). Four decisions were made at today’s special Board of Health meeting:

  1. Occupancy*
    1. Businesses may now increase their operations to 75% of their capacity
  2. Operating hours*
    1. Businesses identified in the previous health order** may now close between the hours of 12:30 AM and 4:00 AM
  3. Maximum assembly at events
    1. Gatherings of up to 50 people are now allowed
    2. Gatherings of 50-250 people are allowed indoors with the approval of an Event Plan Packet (will be posted on the Cascade City-County Health Department COVID-19 & Events webpage before 5:00 AM on Friday 1/22/21)
    3. Gatherings of 50-500 people are allowed outdoors with the approval of an Event Plan Packet (will be posted on the Cascade City-County Health Department COVID-19 & Events webpage before 5:00 AM on Friday 1/22/21)
  4. Date of implementation & duration of Order
    1. The above control measures are effective Friday January 22, 2021 at 5:00 AM and will remain in place until the per capita spread of the virus is 25 per 100,000 for four consecutive weeks

Notes:

  • *Exceptions to occupancy & operating hours, which are not limited to 75% capacity or to new operating hours:
    • Schools: local school districts and school boards for all school-related activities, both academic and extracurricular School Events, both academic and extracurricular 
    • Childcare facilities, in recognition of their critical role in supporting a necessary workforce
    • Food service establishments that serve a population that depends on it as its sole source of food: university dining facilities, cafeterias in K-12 schools, hospital and care facilities, room service in hotels, crisis shelters or similar institutions, airport concessionaires, and any facilities necessary for the response to the emergency, all of which may continue to operate using necessary-only personnel
  • **Businesses identified in previous health order:
    • Restaurants, food courts, cafes, coffee houses, bars, brew pubs, taverns, breweries, microbreweries, distilleries, wineries, tasting rooms, special licensees, clubs, casinos, gyms, movie theaters
  • These restrictions will be continually assessed as we move forward.”

Cascade County Health Board Extends COVID-19 Restrictions

On Wednesday the Cascade County City-County Board of Health voted to keep the mask mandate and mandatory 10:00 PM closing time for bars and restaurants in effect in Cascade County regardless of whether newly seated Governor Greg Gianforte eases the COVID-19 statewide restrictions in the coming days or weeks.

Read the Order here.

The action will keep former Governor Bullock’s July 2020 statewide mask mandate in effect along with Public Health Officer Trisha Gardner’s November 20, 2020 restrictions including closing times, occupancy limits, social distancing and mask requirements.

The County Public Health Officer has legal authority to impose stricter requirements than the state.

Wednesday’s order will remain in effect until Montana’s COVID infection rates fall below 25 per 100,000 for four consecutive weeks.

The current COVID-19 infection in Montana is 38 per 100,000.

So here’s today’s poll question:

[poll id=”29″]

Cascade County Commission Nixes Big Sky Country National Heritage Area

Tuesday afternoon Cascade County Commissioners voted 2-1 to oppose the proposed establishment of the Big Sky Country National Heritage Area.

The lone vote to support the NHA was from Commissioner Jane Weber. Weber, also the chair of the BSCNHA Inc Board of Directors, has been criticized for failing to recuse herself from deliberating on and advocating for the issue despite the potential conflict of interest.

Last week Weber resigned her seat on the Cascade County Commission effective January 22, 2021.

Read more about local opposition to the BSCNHA here.

Big Local Pushback To Big Sky Country National Heritage Area Effort

Editors note: the following is a press release from Montanans Opposing Big Sky Country National Heritage Area.

News Release

For Immediate Release:

Contact: December 2, 2020 Rae Grulkowski
Montanans Opposing Big Sky Country National Heritage Area
rae@3rivers.net
406.788.3204

Montanans Says NO to BSCNHA!

Great Falls, Cascade County, MT – On December 2, 2020, the thirteenth organization submitted their resolution of non-support for the federal designation of Montana land, by Big Sky Country National Heritage Area, (BSCNHA) Inc. More are expected as county residents become aware of the proposed NHA designation of their private property.

BSCNHA, Inc. is a private corporation initially formed in 2015 as the Upper Missouri River Heritage Area Planning Corporation. The purpose of the self-appointed, fourteen member board is to achieve federal designation of a substantial amount of private land within a boundary area desired by this board.

This current proposal engulfs all of Cascade county and a portion of Chouteau county. However, since the ultimate decision of the boundary is made by Congress, it could change again as it has twice since 2015. The proposal is made under the guise of boosting tourism and enhancing economic development. But the community is not buying it as evidenced by the list of city, county, state and federal organizations formally opposing the designation.

Date of Action and Organization

September 9, 2020 Chouteau County and Hill-Liberty-Blaine County Farm Bureaus

September 27, 2020 Cascade County Farm Bureau

October 6, 2020 Chouteau County Trailblazers

October 7, 2020 City of Belt, Montana

October 15, 2020 Town of Cascade, Montana

October 19, 2020 Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund, United Stockgrowers of America (R-CALF, USA)

October 2020 Hilltop Hutterite Colony, Stockett, Montana

October 27, 2020 Great Falls Association of Realtors

October 28, 2020 Eden, Montana Community Hall

November 10, 2020 Montana Farm Bureau Federation

November 19, 2020 Montana Stockgrowers Association

November 24, 2020 Foothills Livestock Association, Great Falls, Montana

December 2, 2020 Montana Grain Growers Association

Additionally, over 3,000 signatures on petitions opposing the designation and an undetermined number of letters of opposition have been written to elected officials and National Park Service representatives.

Jane Weber, the chairperson of the BSCNHA is also Cascade County, District 3 Commissioner. Contrary to her constituents’ desires, she is spearheading BSCNHA’s pursuit of this federal designation. If the feasibility study is a true determination of the community’s desire to work together toward a federal designation, why does the resident voice continue to be ignored? The real question is: Why is this designation so important to this board?

Montana Voters Give GOP Strong Majority In Statehouse

The red wave in Montana dealt a crushing blow to state Democrats.

In addition to sweeping all of the statewide offices from Governor to State Auditor, Republicans won a strong majority in both chambers of the Montana legislature.

In the House, Republicans picked up 9 seats, giving them a 67 to 33 majority there.

The GOP gained one seat in the Senate, growing their majority – 31 R’s, 19 D’s.

It’s hard to imagine a bleaker scenario for Montana Democrats, who didn’t pick up a single seat in the statehouse and lost every statewide race in the 2020 election.

It will be interesting to see if state Democratic Party leaders are able to develop a workable plan for rising from the ashes of this disaster and what changes in messaging or tactics for Dems that plan holds.

Pennsylvania AG Alleges Voter Suppression If Trump Wins

Whether one supports President Trump or Joe Biden, almost everyone agrees that Pennsylvania will be the single most important battleground state in 2020.

As the polls have tightened in recent days, Pennsylvania’s attorney general, a partisan Democrat called Josh Shapiro, preemptively sought to undermine the legitimacy of his state’s own election.

According to Shapiro, Biden will win Pennsylvania — unless the Trump campaign somehow manages to suppress the vote.

It is beyond obnoxious that the media pound away at Trump for airing concerns about voter fraud, while they at the same time echo leftists like Shapiro, who — without evidence — shop their own conspiracies about voter suppression.

Gingrich: Trump Will Win And It “Will Not Be Close”

If virtually all of the polls are to be believed, Joe Biden will soundly defeat President Trump.

Don’t count Newt Gingrich among the believers.

Despite a similar polling deficit in 2016, the historian and former Speaker of the House matter-of-factly predicted that Trump would beat Hillary Clinton, which of course he did.

Today, Gingrich offered a similar prediction, arguing not only that will Trump win, but that he will actually increase his margin of victory in the Electoral College from 2016 (306-232).